Cited by 1,238Information Technology Governance and StrategyInnovation and Knowledge ManagementOutsourcing and Supply Chain Management

Effect of Information Systems Resources and Capabilities on Firm Performance: A Resource-Based Perspective

RAVICHANDRAN, T., LERTWONGSATIEN, CHALERMSAK, LERTWONGSATIEN, CHALERMSAK·2005·Journal of Management Information Systems

Abstract

We draw on the resource-based theory to examine how information systems (IS) resources and capabilities affect firm performance. A basic premise is that a firm's performance can be explained by how effective the firm is in using information technology (IT) to support and enhance its core competencies. In contrast to past studies that have implicitly assumed that IS assets could have direct effects on firm performance, this study draws from the resource complementarity arguments and posits that it is the targeted use of IS assets that is likely to be rent-yielding. We develop the theoretical underpinnings of this premise and propose a model that interrelates IS resources, IS capabilities, IT support for core competencies, and firm performance. The model is empirically tested using data collected from 129 firms in the United States. The results provide strong support for the research model and suggest that variation in firm performance is explained by the extent to which IT is used to support and enhance a firm's core competencies. The results also support our proposition that an organization's ability to use IT to support its core competencies is dependent on IS functional capabilities, which, in turn, are dependent on the nature of human, technology, and relationship resources of the IS department. These results are interpreted and the implications of this study for IS research and practice are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07421222.2005.11045820

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
RAVICHANDRAN, T., LERTWONGSATIEN, C., & LERTWONGSATIEN, C.
Affiliations
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Venue
Journal of Management Information Systems
Published
2005-04
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
237-276
ISSN
  • 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-928X
OpenAlex
W1919895648
Cited by
1,238
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 80 · 2012: 80
FWCI
52.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
Keywords
information systems resources, information systems capabilities, firm performance, resource-based view, core competencies, resource complementarity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review