Cited by 606Consumer Retail Behavior StudiesTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourDigital Marketing and Social Media

Virtual Product Experience: Effects of Visual and Functional Control of Products on Perceived Diagnosticity and Flow in Electronic Shopping

Open access
JIANG, ZHENHUI, BENBASAT, IZAK·2004·Journal of Management Information Systems

Abstract

The development of electronic commerce has been constrained by the inability of online consumers to feel, touch, and sample products through Web interfaces, as they are able to do in conventional in-store shopping. Previous academic studies have argued that this limitation could be partly alleviated by providing consumers with virtual product experience (VPE), to enable potential customers to experience products virtually. This paper discusses virtual control, a specific type of VPE implementation, and identifies its two dimensions: visual control and functional control. Visual control enables consumers to manipulate Web product images, to view products from various angles and distances; functional control enables consumers to explore and experience different features and functions of products. The individual and joint effects of visual and functional control were investigated in a laboratory experiment, the results of which indicated that visual and functional control increased the perceived diagnosticity (i.e., the extent to which a consumer believes the shopping experience is helpful to evaluate a product) of their corresponding attribute factors, and that both visual and functional control increased consumer overall perceived diagnosticity and flow.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07421222.2004.11045817

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 91 · Cited by 606

Authors
JIANG, Z., & BENBASAT, I.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Venue
Journal of Management Information Systems
Published
2004-11
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
111-147
ISSN
  • 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-928X
OpenAlex
W3124679280
Cited by
606
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 31
FWCI
52.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  • Luonnontieteiden ja Tekniikan Tutkimuksen Toimikunta
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
virtual control, visual control, functional control, perceived diagnosticity, flow, online shopping, e-commerce, customer experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review