Cited by 233Sharing Economy and PlatformsDigital Platforms and EconomicsSupply Chain and Inventory Management

Intermediation in a Sharing Economy: Insurance, Moral Hazard, and Rent Extraction

Open access
Weber, Thomas A.·2014·Journal of Management Information Systems

Abstract

A key impediment to sharing is a lender’s concern about damage to a lent item due to unobservable actions by a renter, usually resulting in moral hazard. This paper shows how an intermediary can eliminate the moral hazard problem by providing optimal insurance to the lender and first-best incentives to the renter to exert care, as long as market participants are risk neutral. The solution is illustrated for the collaborative housing market but applies in principle to any sharing market with vertically differentiated goods. A population of renters, heterogeneous both in their preferences for housing quality and with respect to the amount of care they exert in a rental situation, face a choice between collaborative housing and staying at a local hotel. The private hosts choose their prices strategically, and the intermediary sets commission rates on both sides of the market as well as insurance terms for the rental agreement. The latter are set to eliminate moral hazard. The intermediary is able to extract the gains the hosts would earn if transacting directly. Finally, even if hotels set their prices at the outset so as to maximize collusive profits, collaborative housing persists at substantial market shares, regardless of the difference between the efficiencies of hosts and hotels to reduce renters’ cost of effort. The aggregate of hosts, intermediary, and hotels benefits from (a variety in) these effort costs, which indicates that the intermediated sharing of goods is an ec…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07421222.2014.995520

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A supplier's concern about damage to a certain resource due to hidden actions by a consumer is a key impediment to sharing.

    “A supplier's concern about damage to a certain resource due to hidden actions by a consumer is a key impediment to sharing ( Weber 2014).”

    From Trust in the Sharing Economy (2016) · cites this paper as Weber 2014

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 233

Authors
Weber, T. A.
Affiliations
École Centrale Paris (FR)
Corresponding author
Weber, Thomas A.
Venue
Journal of Management Information Systems
Published
2014-07-03
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
35-71
ISSN
  • 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-928X
OpenAlex
W2023136032
Cited by
233
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
37.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
Keywords
sharing economy, intermediation, moral hazard, rent extraction, insurance, collaborative housing, peer-to-peer rental, commission rates, vertical differentiation, hotel competition, risk neutrality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review