Intermediation in a Sharing Economy: Insurance, Moral Hazard, and Rent Extraction
Open accessAbstract
A key impediment to sharing is a lender’s concern about damage to a lent item due to unobservable actions by a renter, usually resulting in moral hazard. This paper shows how an intermediary can eliminate the moral hazard problem by providing optimal insurance to the lender and first-best incentives to the renter to exert care, as long as market participants are risk neutral. The solution is illustrated for the collaborative housing market but applies in principle to any sharing market with vertically differentiated goods. A population of renters, heterogeneous both in their preferences for housing quality and with respect to the amount of care they exert in a rental situation, face a choice between collaborative housing and staying at a local hotel. The private hosts choose their prices strategically, and the intermediary sets commission rates on both sides of the market as well as insurance terms for the rental agreement. The latter are set to eliminate moral hazard. The intermediary is able to extract the gains the hosts would earn if transacting directly. Finally, even if hotels set their prices at the outset so as to maximize collusive profits, collaborative housing persists at substantial market shares, regardless of the difference between the efficiencies of hosts and hotels to reduce renters’ cost of effort. The aggregate of hosts, intermediary, and hotels benefits from (a variety in) these effort costs, which indicates that the intermediated sharing of goods is an ec…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A supplier's concern about damage to a certain resource due to hidden actions by a consumer is a key impediment to sharing.
“A supplier's concern about damage to a certain resource due to hidden actions by a consumer is a key impediment to sharing ( Weber 2014).”
From Trust in the Sharing Economy (2016) · cites this paper as Weber 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 233
- Authors
- Weber, T. A.
- Affiliations
- École Centrale Paris (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Weber, Thomas A.
- ORCID
- Weber, Thomas A.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-07-03
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 35-71
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-928X
- OpenAlex
- W2023136032
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 37.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Journal of Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
- Keywords
- sharing economy, intermediation, moral hazard, rent extraction, insurance, collaborative housing, peer-to-peer rental, commission rates, vertical differentiation, hotel competition, risk neutrality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review