Cited by 52Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsEnvironmental and Sediment Control

Limnological and Loading Information and a Phosphorus Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Analysis for Onondaga Lake

Open access
Effler, Steven W., O'Donnell, Susan M., Matthews, David A., Matthews, Carol M., O'Donnell, David M., Auer, Martin T., Owens, Emmet M.·2002·Lake and Reservoir Management

Abstract

The phosphorus (P) total maximum daily load (TMDL) analysis and associated management plan for culturally eutrophic Onondaga Lake, NY, are critically evaluated based on available input/discharge and limnological information for the system. The evaluation is based on: (1) results from a long-term monitoring program conducted on the lake, its tributaries, and the adjoining river that receives the lake's outflow, (2) algal bioassay experiments of the bioavailability of particulate P (PP) in inputs to the lake, (3) loading rate calculations for forms of P in these inputs, (4) calculations of water densities in inflows and the lake, (5) model analyses of plunging interflows and responses to seasonal material loading, and (6) mass balance calculations for a tracer conducted around the lake outlet and the receiving river to estimate inflow to the lake from the river. Several important system-specific characteristics were found not to be accommodated in the current TMDL analysis, including: (1) a P load from the river back into the lake, (2)seasonal plunging of tributaries to depths below the productive layers of the lake, (3) incomplete and different bioavailabilities of PP in the various inputs, (4) the different settling velocities of PP from these sources, (5) false high estimates of TP loading from tributaries associated with turbidity interferences in P analyses, and(6)the implications of the high flushing rate of the lake for strong seasonality in the relative impacts of externals loads. The TMDL analysis is demonstrated to understate the present role of the dominant point source and overstate the importance of non-point sources. Recommendations are made to upgrade the TMDL analysis through an integrated program of model development, testing and application, supporting process studies and monitoring, and re-evaluation of management options.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07438140209354140

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Onondaga County Metropolitan Syracuse Wastewater Treatment Plant (Metro) was the most significant nutrient load to Onondaga Lake and had significant effects on its trophic state and fish habitat structure and availability.

    “The Onondaga County Metropolitan Syracuse Wastewater Treatment Plant (Metro) was the most significant nutrient load to the lake and had significant effects on its trophic state and fish habitat structure and availability (Effler et al. 2002).”

    From Assessment of the Onondaga Lake, New York, fish community following reductions of nutrient inputs from a wastewater treatment plant (2015) · cites this paper as Effler et al. 2002

    External Total Phosphorus Loads (p. 6) identifies Metro as the largest measured phosphorus source, contributing 68% of annual loads; Cultural Eutrophication (p. 5) links high phosphorus loading to the lake’s eutrophic state. That section also reports oxygen depletion and fish migration, but it does not establish that Metro specifically changed fish habitat structure or availability. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Through the late 1990s, the Metro input represented 80% of effective phosphorus loading to Onondaga Lake.

    “Through the late 1990s the Metro input represented 80% of the total nitrogen (N) loading (Matthews et al. 2001) and 80% of the effective ( i.e. , can support phytoplankton growth) P loading (Effler et al. 2002).”
  • Dissolved P entrained into the upper productive layers from the enriched hypolimnion during the fall mixing period is not a concern for the subsequent year's summer stratification interval because it is either deposited or exported in the interim because of the lake's high flushing rate.

    “The dissolved P entrained into the upper productive layers from the enriched hypolimnion during the fall mixing period is not a concern for the subsequent year's summer stratification interval because it is either deposited or exported in the interim because of the lake's high flushing rate (Effler et al. 2002).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. APHA (American Public Health Association) (1992) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th Edition. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
  2. Budd, L. F. and D. W. Meals. 1994. Lake Champlain nonpointsource pollution assessment. Technical Report 6A. Prepared for Lake Champlain Management Conference, Burlington, VT.
  3. Chapra, S. C. 1997. Surface water-quality modeling. McGraw-Hill, New York. 844 p.
  4. Chen, C. T. and F. J. Millero. 1978. The equation of state of seawater determined from sound speeds. Journal of Marine Research 36:657-691.
  5. Effler, S. W. 1996. Limnological and engineering analysis of a polluted urban lake. Prelude to environmental management of Onondaga Lake, New York. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
  6. Effler, S. W. and G. Harnett. 1996. Background. P. 1-31. In: S. W. Effler (ed). Limnological and engineering analysis of a polluted urbanlake. Prelude to environmental management of Onondaga Lake, New York. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
  7. Effler, S. W. and K. A. Whitehead. 1996. Tributaries and discharges. P. 97-199. In: S. W. Effler (ed). Limnological and engineering analysis of a polluted urban lake. Prelude to environmental management of Onondaga Lake, New York. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
  8. Fischer, H. B., E. J. List, J. Imberger, R. C. Koh and N. H. Brooks. 1979. Mixing in inland and coastal waters. Academic Press, NY
  9. Kishbaugh, S. A. 1993. Applications and limitations of qualitative lake assessment data. Abstract, paper presented at North American Lake Management Society Conference, Seattle. 12-31993.
  10. Matthews, D. A. and S. W. Effler. 2001. Reduction in pollutant loading from residual soda ash waste. Water Air Soil Pollut. (in review).
  11. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. 1991. Wastewater engineering: Treatment, disposal, and reuse. McGraw-Hill, Boston, Irwin.
  12. Millero, F. J., A. Gonzalez and G. K. Ward. 1976. The density of seawater solutions at one atmosphere as a function of temperature and salinity. Journal of Marine Research 34:61-93.
  13. Naumann, W. R. 1993. Determination of surface gas transfer in a stratified river. M.S. Thesis. Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
  14. Needham, M. L. 2000. Bioavailability of Particulate Phosphorus and Implications for TMDL Development. M.S. Thesis. Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI. 71 p.
  15. Owens, E. M. and S. W. Effler. 1996a. Hydrodynamics and transport. P. 200-262. In: S. W. Effler (ed.). Limnological and engineering analysis of a polluted urban lake. Prelude to environmental management of Onondaga Lake, New York. Springer-Verlag, New York. NY.
  16. Wetzel, R. G. 2001. Limnology: lake and reservoir ecosystems. Academic Press, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Effler, S. W., O'Donnell, S. M., Matthews, D. A., Matthews, C. M., O'Donnell, D. M., Auer, M. T., & Owens, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Upstate Freshwater Institute (US)
  • Upstate Freshwater Institute
  • Innovative Engineering & Technology
  • Michigan Technological University (US)
  • Syracuse University (US)
Venue
Lake and Reservoir Management
Published
2002-06
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
87-108
ISSN
  • 0743-8141 (ISSN-L)
  • 1040-2381
  • 2151-5530
OpenAlex
W2052194305
Cited by
52
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lake and Reservoir Management (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (Michigan Technological University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Sediment Control
Keywords
Onondaga Lake, eutrophication, phosphorus loading, mass balance, tracer studies, flushing rate, turbidity interference, water density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review