Cited by 183Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMedia Influence and HealthHealth and Lifestyle Studies

Results of a Social Norm Intervention to Prevent Binge Drinking Among First-year Residential College Students

Werch, Chudley E., Pappas, Deborah M., Carlson, Joan M., DiClemente, Carlo C., Chally, Pamela S., Sinder, Jacqueline A.·2000·Journal of American College Health

Abstract

The effects of a primary prevention social norm intervention on binge drinking among 1st-year residential college students were examined. Six hundred thirty-four students attending a medium-sized public university in the South were randomly assigned to receive a two-phase social norm intervention or the standard campus psychoeducational prevention program. At posttest, no differences were found between intervention and control group students on any of the alcohol use and alcohol-use risk factor measures. Significant subgroup differences were found by stage of initiating binge drinking behaviors, for frequency of alcohol use, F(3, 507) = 3.69, p = .01; quantity of alcohol use, F(3, 507) = 2.51, p = .05; and social norms, F(3, 505) = 2.53, p = .05. These findings suggest the need for tailoring social norm binge drinking interventions to students' stage of initiating heavy drinking and carefully monitoring for potential negative, as well as positive, effects of norm-based prevention messages.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07448480009596288

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies indicate that social-norms marketing campaigns have actually increased the undesirable behaviors and misperceptions they set out to decrease.

    “In fact, some studies indicate that social-norms marketing campaigns have actually increased the undesirable behaviors and misperceptions they set out to decrease (e.g., Perkins, Haines, & Rice, 2005;Wechsler et al., 2003;Werch et al., 2000).”

    From The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms (2007) · cites this paper as Werch et al., 2000

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 27 · Cited by 183

Authors
Werch, C. E., Pappas, D. M., Carlson, J. M., DiClemente, C. C., Chally, P. S., & Sinder, J. A.
Affiliations
University of North Florida (US)
Venue
Journal of American College Health
Published
2000-09-01
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
85-92
ISSN
  • 0164-4300 (ISSN-L)
  • 0744-8481
  • 1940-3208
OpenAlex
W2003036299
Cited by
183
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of American College Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
Keywords
binge drinking, social norms interventions, primary prevention, first-year college students, alcohol consumption, intervention tailoring, risk factors for alcohol use
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholic Intoxication, Analysis of Variance, Female, Health Education, Humans, Male, Reference Values, Risk Factors, Social Identification, Social Values, Students, United States, Universities, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review