CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 191Mental Health Treatment and AccessHigher Education Research StudiesStudent Stress and Coping

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Comparative Study of Campus Experiences of College Students With Mental Illnesses Versus a General College Sample

Salzer, Mark S.·2012·Journal of American College Health
DOI 10.1080/07448481.2011.552537
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Examine campus experiences and relationships of college students with mental illnesses compared to general student norms using the College Student Experiences Questionnaire to understand potential sources of distress and retention issues. PARTICIPANTS: Responses were obtained from 449 former and current students with mental illnesses from more than 300 colleges and universities around the country. METHODS: Participants completed an online survey available from July 2005 to July 2006. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of variance and t test results indicate that college students with mental illnesses report less engagement on campus and poorer relationships, and that these factors were associated with lower graduation rates. Students reporting they were treated differently "most of the time" because of a mental illness had the lowest levels of engagement and poorest relationships. CONCLUSIONS: More attention is needed to developing interventions that enhance social functioning and engagement and address stigma on campus in order to reduce distress and enhance retention.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07448481.2011.552537

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Erickson-Cornish J, 2000, J Coll Stud Dev, 41, 104
  2. Gallagher R., 2008, National Survey of Counseling Center Directors
  3. Kadison R, 2004, College of the Overwhelmed
  4. 10.1176/appi.ps.57.7.914 · DOI
  5. 10.1176/appi.ps.59.4.370 · DOI
  6. Salzer M S, 2006, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Skills in Practice: A CPRP Preparation and Skills Workbook
  7. 2007, Supporting Students: A Model Policy for Colleges and Universities

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 191

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Salzer, M. S.
Affiliations
Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Salzer, Mark S.
ORCID
Salzer, Mark S.
Venue
Journal of American College Health
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2012-01
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
1-7
ISSN
  • 0164-4300 (ISSN-L)
  • 0744-8481
  • 1940-3208
DOI
10.1080/07448481.2011.552537
OpenAlex
W2084221514
Cited by
191
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of American College Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Temple University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
campus experience, student engagement, peer relationships, graduation rates, student retention, stigma, College Student Experiences Questionnaire, social functioning, distress
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Mental Disorders, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Social Support, Students, United States, Universities, Multivariate Analysis, Internet, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review