Cited by 145

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding stress as an impediment to academic performance

Frazier, Patricia, Gabriel, Abigail, Merians, Addie, Lust, Katherine·2019·Journal of American College Health

Abstract

Objectives: Stress is the most commonly reported impediment to academic performance among college students. The objectives of this study were to examine the accuracy of these perceptions, identify demographic and psychosocial factors that distinguished among students who differed in perceptions of how stress affected their performance, and assess the relations between these factors and grade point average (GPA). Participants: Undergraduate students ( N = 8,997) from 20 Midwestern schools. Methods: Participants completed online surveys during February-March 2015 that assessed perceived impediments to academic performance, cumulative GPA, demographic information, and psychosocial factors. Results: Students who reported that stress affected their performance had lower GPAs, and reported more stress and lower coping self-efficacy, resilience, and social support. Male, heterosexual, and ethnic-minority students were less likely to report having stress (but did not have higher GPAs). Conclusion: Stress reduction interventions should target psychosocial factors related to perceiving stress as an impediment and to poorer performance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07448481.2018.1499649

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31823b1440 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/00918369.2011.605738 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1080/07448481.2014.917653 · DOI
  4. Lindsey BJ, 2009, Coll Stud J, 4, 999
  5. 10.1037/a0040322 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/0091552114535466 · DOI
  7. Birne-Lefcovitch S, 2000, J First-Year Exp Stud Trans, 12, 61
  8. 10.1080/07448481.2016.1154559 · DOI
  9. 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1037/a0032052 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/01443410.2014.893560 · DOI
  12. 10.1177/0272431610366249 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.3102/00346543075001063 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1207/S15327043HUP1604_2 · DOI
  15. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00779 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Frazier, P., Gabriel, A., Merians, A., & Lust, K.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA;
  • Boynton Health Services, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Venue
Journal of American College Health
Published
2018-10-04
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
562-570
ISSN
  • 0744-8481
  • 1940-3208
Cited by
145
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review