Cited by 36Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Research

Glycaemic efficacy and safety of linagliptin for the management of non-cardiac surgery patients with type 2 diabetes in a real-world setting: Lina-surg study

Open access
Pérez-Belmonte, Luis M., Osuna-Sánchez, Julio, Millán-Gómez, Mercedes, López-Carmona, María D., Gómez-Doblas, Juan J., Cobos-Palacios, Lidia, Sanz-Cánovas, Jaime, Barbancho, Miguel A. +4 more·2019·Annals of Medicine

Abstract

Introduction: The use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in hospitalized patients is an area of active research. We aimed to compare the efficacy and the safety of the basal-bolus insulin regimen versus linagliptin-basal insulin in non-critically ill non-cardiac surgery patients in a real-world setting.Methods: We enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes hospitalized in non-cardiac surgery departments with admission glycated haemoglobin level < 8%, admission blood glucose concentration < 240 mg/dL, and no at-home injectable treatments who were treated with basal-bolus (n = 347) or linagliptin-basal (n = 190) regimens between January 2016 and December 2017. To match patients on the two regimens, a propensity matching analysis was performed.Results: After matching, 120 patients were included in each group. No differences were noted in mean blood glucose concentration after admission (p = .162), number of patients with a mean blood glucose 100–140 mg/dL (p = .163) and > 200 mg/dL (p = .199), and treatment failures (p = .395). Total daily insulin and number of daily insulin injections were lower in the linagliptin-basal group (both p < .001). Patients on linagliptin-basal insulin had fewer hypoglycaemic events (blood glucose < 70 mg/dL) (p < .001).Conclusion: For type 2 diabetes surgery patients with mild to moderate hyperglycaemia without pre-hospitalization injectable therapies, linagliptin-basal insulin was an effective, safe alternative with fewer hypoglycaemic events in real-world practice.Key messagesTreatment with basal-bolus insulin regimens is the standard of care for non-critically ill hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes.A differentiated treatment protocol that takes into account glycaemic control and clinical factors should be implemented in the hospital setting.Linagliptin-basal insulin is an effective, safe alternative with fewer hypoglycaemic events during the hospitalization of non-critically ill non-cardiac surgery patients with T2D in real-world practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07853890.2019.1613672

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a single-center RCT, correctional insulin sliding scales for bedtime hyperglycemia did not improve glycemic control in T2D patients.

    “In a single-center RCT, the use of correctional insulin sliding scales for bedtime hyperglycemia did not improve glycemic control in persons with T2D.1341,1342”

    From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [1342]

    The Study design and hospital antihyperglycaemic protocol section describes supplemental rapid-acting insulin before meals and bedtime, but does not test bedtime correctional insulin against a no-correction group. The Results compare linagliptin–basal with basal-bolus treatment, not the effect of bedtime sliding scales. Searches for a single-center randomized trial and bedtime correctional insulin did not locate the claimed finding in our copy; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 36

Authors
Pérez-Belmonte, L. M., Osuna-Sánchez, J., Millán-Gómez, M., López-Carmona, M. D., Gómez-Doblas, J. J., Cobos-Palacios, L., Sanz-Cánovas, J., Barbancho, M. A., Lara, J. P., Jiménez-Navarro, M., Bernal-López, M. R., & Gómez-Huelgas, R.
Affiliations
  • Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Universidad de Málaga (UMA), Málaga, Spain;
  • Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Comarcal de Melilla, Melilla, Spain;
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain;
  • Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga (ES)
  • Unidad de Neurofisiología Cognitiva, Centro de Investigaciones Médico Sanitarias (CIMES), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Universidad de Málaga (UMA), Campus de Excelencia Internacional (CEI) Andalucía Tech, Málaga, Spain;
  • Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (ES)
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
Venue
Annals of Medicine
Published
2019-05-19
Volume
51
Issue
3-4
Pages
252-261
ISSN
  • 0785-3890 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2060
OpenAlex
W2943662632
Cited by
36
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RISalud Institutional Health Repository of Andalucía (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional-FEDER (CB06/03/0018)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
linagliptin, type 2 diabetes, non-cardiac surgery, multiple daily insulin injections, DPP-4 inhibitors, glycemic control, hypoglycemia, hospitalized patients, hyperglycemia, insulin dose reduction, real-world evidence
MeSH terms
Linagliptin, Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Hospitalization, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Safety, Spain, Treatment Outcome, Treatment Failure, Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review