Learning to be silent: examining Chinese elementary students’ stories about why they do not speak in class
Abstract
Prior research often attributed Chinese students’ classroom silence to their previous schooling experiences, yet rarely provides evidence of exactly how these experiences shaped students into silent learners. Through surveys and in-depth interviews with Chinese 6th graders, our study examined how students ‘learned to be silent’. Guided by the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) framework, our analysis showed that students’ non-participating behaviours are driven by intentions consisting of behavioural, normative and control beliefs towards classroom participation, which are generated from their previous schooling experiences. Theoretically, we suggested that: (1) Chinese elementary students’ silence should be treated as a learnt behaviour rather than attributed to culture or habit; (2) similar previous experiences may trigger significantly different intentions in students; (3) different, even contradictory intentions can lead to students’ silence; (4) some significant factors identified in earlier research did not present in our data, suggesting reasons for classroom silence may change over time. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The IRE format, in which the teacher praises correct answers and corrects those that are wrong, allows students to leave with the impression that speaking up in class should serve the purpose of providing the right answers.
“The IRE format, in which the teacher praises correct answers and corrects those that are wrong, allows students to leave with the impression that speaking up in class should serve the purpose of providing the right answers (Tang, Wang, and Wong 2020).”
From The Impact of a Dialogic Intervention on a Chinese Rural Teacher and Students' Stances Towards Texts (2025) · cites this paper as Tang, Wang, and Wong 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 22
- Authors
- Tang, X., Wang, Y., & Wong, D.
- Affiliations
- Southwest University (CN)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Yi
- Venue
- Language, Culture and Curriculum
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-01-22
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 384-401
- ISSN
- 0790-8318 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-7573
- OpenAlex
- W3002431691
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 12.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language Culture and Curriculum (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Keywords
- classroom silence, student participation, theory of planned behavior, student intention, learned behavior, normative beliefs, control beliefs, behavioral beliefs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review