Cited by 22EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningCommunication in Education and HealthcareMultilingual Education and Policy

Learning to be silent: examining Chinese elementary students’ stories about why they do not speak in class

Tang, Xiaowei, Wang, Yi, Wong, David·2020·Language, Culture and Curriculum

Abstract

Prior research often attributed Chinese students’ classroom silence to their previous schooling experiences, yet rarely provides evidence of exactly how these experiences shaped students into silent learners. Through surveys and in-depth interviews with Chinese 6th graders, our study examined how students ‘learned to be silent’. Guided by the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) framework, our analysis showed that students’ non-participating behaviours are driven by intentions consisting of behavioural, normative and control beliefs towards classroom participation, which are generated from their previous schooling experiences. Theoretically, we suggested that: (1) Chinese elementary students’ silence should be treated as a learnt behaviour rather than attributed to culture or habit; (2) similar previous experiences may trigger significantly different intentions in students; (3) different, even contradictory intentions can lead to students’ silence; (4) some significant factors identified in earlier research did not present in our data, suggesting reasons for classroom silence may change over time. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07908318.2020.1715999

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The IRE format, in which the teacher praises correct answers and corrects those that are wrong, allows students to leave with the impression that speaking up in class should serve the purpose of providing the right answers.

    “The IRE format, in which the teacher praises correct answers and corrects those that are wrong, allows students to leave with the impression that speaking up in class should serve the purpose of providing the right answers (Tang, Wang, and Wong 2020).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 22

Authors
Tang, X., Wang, Y., & Wong, D.
Affiliations
  • Southwest University (CN)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Yi
Venue
Language, Culture and Curriculum
Published
2020-01-22
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
384-401
ISSN
  • 0790-8318 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-7573
OpenAlex
W3002431691
Cited by
22
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
12.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Language Culture and Curriculum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
Keywords
classroom silence, student participation, theory of planned behavior, student intention, learned behavior, normative beliefs, control beliefs, behavioral beliefs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review