The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association between prenatal treatment and clinical manifestations of congenital toxoplasmosis in infancy: A cohort study in 13 European centres
Abstract
AIM: To determine the effectiveness of prenatal treatment for clinical manifestations of congenital toxoplasmosis. METHODS: We prospectively identified 255 live-born infants with congenital toxoplasmosis using prenatal or neonatal screening. We determined the effect of prenatal treatment on the risks of intracranial or ocular lesions in infancy, accounting for gestational age at maternal seroconversion. RESULTS: Prenatal treatment within 4 wk of seroconversion reduced the risk of intracranial lesions compared with no treatment (odds ratio, OR 0.28; 95% CI: 0.08-0.75), but there was no significant effect when initiated after 4 wk (OR 0.76; 95% CI: 0.35-1.59; overall p-value 0.19). Compared to spiramycin alone, no treatment doubled the risk of intracranial lesions (OR 2.33; 95% CI: 1.04-5.50), but the risk did not differ with pyrimethamine-sulphonamide treatment (overall p-value 0.52). There was no consistent relationship between the type or timing of treatment and the risk of ocular lesions. Gestational age at maternal seroconversion was inversely associated with the risk of intracranial but not ocular lesions. CONCLUSION: Only early versus no prenatal treatment for intracranial lesions showed a statistically significant benefit. A large randomized controlled trial and/or meta-analysis of individual patient data from cohort studies is required to confirm these findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The use of fractional polynomials to model continuous risk variables in epidemiology
Royston, P., Ambler, G., & Sauerbrei, W. (1999) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/28.5.964 · Cited by 1,066
Cited by
Treatment of Toxoplasmosis: Historical Perspective, Animal Models, and Current Clinical Practice
Dunay, I. R., Gajurel, K., Dhakal, R., Liesenfeld, O., & Montoya, J. G. (2018) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00057-17 · Cited by 553
(2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60072-5 · Cited by 542
Risk Factors for Toxoplasma gondii Infection in the United States
Jones, J. L., Dargelas, V., Roberts, J., Press, C., Remington, J. S., & Montoya, J. G. (2009) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/605433 · Cited by 490
Ocular Sequelae of Congenital Toxoplasmosis in Brazil Compared with Europe
Gilbert, R. E., Freeman, K., Lago, E. G., Bahia-Oliveira, L. M. G., Tan, H. K., Wallon, M., Buffolano, W., Stanford, M. R., Petersen, E., & (EMSCOT), F. T. E. M. S. O. C. T. (2008) · PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000277 · Cited by 324
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gras, L. A., Wallon, M., Pollak, A. J., Cortina‐Borja, M., Evengård, B., Hayde, M., Petersen, E., & Gilbert, R. E.
- Venue
- Acta Paediatrica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-12-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1721-1731
- ISSN
- 0365-1436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167681684
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association between prenatal treatment and clinical manifestations of congenital toxoplasmosis in infancy: A cohort study in 13 European centres. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08035250500251999
- The paper
- Gras, L. A., Wallon, M., Pollak, A. J., Cortina‐Borja, M., Evengård, B., Hayde, M., Petersen, E., & Gilbert, R. E. (2005). Association between prenatal treatment and clinical manifestations of congenital toxoplasmosis in infancy: A cohort study in 13 European centres. Acta Paediatrica. https://doi.org/10.1080/08035250500251999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.