Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 324

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ocular Sequelae of Congenital Toxoplasmosis in Brazil Compared with Europe

Open access
Gilbert, Ruth E., Freeman, Katherine, Lago, Eleonor G., Bahia-Oliveira, Lilian M. G., Tan, Hooi Kuan, Wallon, Martine, Buffolano, Wilma, Stanford, Miles R., Petersen, Eskild, for The European Multicentre Study on Congenital Toxoplasmosis (EMSCOT)·2008·PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis appears to be more severe in Brazil, where it is a leading cause of blindness, than in Europe, but direct comparisons are lacking. Evidence is accumulating that more virulent genotypes of Toxoplasma gondii predominate in South America. METHODS: We compared prospective cohorts of children with congenital toxoplasmosis identified by universal neonatal screening in Brazil and neonatal or prenatal screening in Europe between 1992 and 2003, using the same protocol in both continents. RESULTS: Three hundred and eleven (311) children had congenital toxoplasmosis: 30 in Brazil and 281 in Europe, where 71 were identified by neonatal screening. Median follow up was 4.1 years in Europe and 3.7 years in Brazil. Relatively more children had retinochoroiditis during the first year in Brazil than in Europe (15/30; 50% versus 29/281; 10%) and the risk of lesions by 4 years of age was much higher: the hazard ratio for Brazil versus Europe was 5.36 (95%CI: 3.17, 9.08). Children in Brazil had larger lesions, which were more likely to be multiple and to affect the posterior pole (p<0.0001). In Brazil, visual impairment (<6/12 Snellen) was predicted for most affected eyes (87%, 27/31), but not in Europe (29%; 20/69, p<0.0001). The size of newly detected lesions decreased with age (p = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: T. gondii causes more severe ocular disease in congenitally infected children in Brazil compared with Europe. The marked differences in the frequency, size and multiplicity of retinochoroidal lesions may be due to infection with more virulent genotypes of the parasite that predominate in Brazil but are rarely found in Europe.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000277

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 324

Metadata

Authors
Gilbert, R. E., Freeman, K., Lago, E. G., Bahia-Oliveira, L. M. G., Tan, H. K., Wallon, M., Buffolano, W., Stanford, M. R., Petersen, E., & (EMSCOT), F. T. E. M. S. O. C. T.
Venue
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Published
2008-08-13
Volume
2
Issue
8
Pages
e277
ISSN
  • 1935-2727 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-2735
OpenAlex
W2066056465
Cited by
324
References
27
FWCI
9.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ocular Sequelae of Congenital Toxoplasmosis in Brazil Compared with Europe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000277
The paper
Gilbert, R. E., Freeman, K., Lago, E. G., Bahia-Oliveira, L. M. G., Tan, H. K., Wallon, M., Buffolano, W., Stanford, M. R., Petersen, E., & (EMSCOT), F. T. E. M. S. O. C. T. (2008). Ocular Sequelae of Congenital Toxoplasmosis in Brazil Compared with Europe. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000277

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.