The contemporary women's movement in the Philippines
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 1984 march was organized by a new women's coalition called Gabriela, signaling the arrival of a powerful, militant, progressive women's voice that would articulate demands across the political spectrum.
“Lee explains that ' the march was organized by a new women ' s coalition called Gabriela. It signalled the arrival on the national scene of a powerful, militant and progressive women ' s voice that would articulate and act on demands across the political spectrum”
From Following<i>La Pieta</i>: Toward a Transpacific Feminist Historiography of Philippine Authoritarianism (2019) · cites this paper as Lee 1988
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diaz, J. M. (2019) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/701157 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lee, L.
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Lynn
- Venue
- Australian Feminist Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1988-12
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 7-8
- Pages
- 217-223
- ISSN
- 0816-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3303
- OpenAlex
- W1990589881
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australian Feminist Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminism, Gender, and Social Issues
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- women's movement, feminism, Philippine women, gender politics, women's activism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review