Cited by 15Historical Gender and Feminism StudiesFeminism, Gender, and Social IssuesGender and Feminist Studies

The contemporary women's movement in the Philippines

Lee, Lynn·1988·Australian Feminist Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08164649.1988.9961620

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 1984 march was organized by a new women's coalition called Gabriela, signaling the arrival of a powerful, militant, progressive women's voice that would articulate demands across the political spectrum.

    “Lee explains that ' the march was organized by a new women ' s coalition called Gabriela. It signalled the arrival on the national scene of a powerful, militant and progressive women ' s voice that would articulate and act on demands across the political spectrum”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, L.
Corresponding author
Lee, Lynn
Venue
Australian Feminist Studies
Published
1988-12
Volume
3
Issue
7-8
Pages
217-223
ISSN
  • 0816-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3303
OpenAlex
W1990589881
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Australian Feminist Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminism, Gender, and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
women's movement, feminism, Philippine women, gender politics, women's activism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review