Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 370

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

TRENDS IN RED MUD UTILIZATION – A REVIEW

PARAMGURU, R. K., RATH, P. C., MISRA, V. N.·2004·Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review

Abstract

Red mud is the major waste material produced during alumina production following the Bayers process. Depending on the quality of the raw material processed, 1–2.5 tons of red mud is generated per ton of alumina produced. The treatment and disposal of this residue is a major operation in an alumina plant. A lot of research and developmental activities are going on throughout the world to find effective utilization of red mud, which involves various product developments. This article attempts to review these developments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08827500490477603

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 370

Metadata

Authors
PARAMGURU, R. K., RATH, P. C., & MISRA, V. N.
Venue
Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review
Published
2004-12-16
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
1-29
ISSN
  • 0882-7508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7401
OpenAlex
W2080416530
Cited by
370
References
0
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TRENDS IN RED MUD UTILIZATION – A REVIEW. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08827500490477603
The paper
PARAMGURU, R. K., RATH, P. C., & MISRA, V. N. (2004). TRENDS IN RED MUD UTILIZATION – A REVIEW. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/08827500490477603

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.