CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 49Accounting Education and CareersManagement and Marketing EducationHigher Education and Employability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhancing Student Experiential Learning With Structured Interviews

Cornell, Robert M., Johnson, Carol B., Schwartz, William C.·2013·Journal of Education for Business
DOI 10.1080/08832323.2012.659296
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Learning through experience can be rewarding but intimidating. To maximize the benefits of experiential learning assignments, students need to have confidence in their abilities. The authors report how a structured-interview instrument effectively facilitated experiential learning for accounting students without extensive content-specific knowledge. A total of 117 students administered the structured interview to individuals in charge of financial operations in a religious organization. Analysis of student reactions indicated that the experience helped them to internalize concepts from their classroom learning and formulate recommendations for control and other improvements in the organization. The structured-interview experiential learning assignment successfully enhanced student confidence and reduced anxiety.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08832323.2012.659296

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Albrecht W. S., 2008, Fraud examination
  2. Bandura A., 1986, Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory
  3. Busby D., 2004, The Clergy Journal, 25
  4. Kolb D. A., 2000, Perspectives on cognition, learning and thinking styles, 227
  5. Kvale S., 2008, InterViews
  6. Throop J. T., 2001, The Clergy Journal, 27
  7. Ventura M. F., 2010, Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting, 2, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 49

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Cornell, R. M., Johnson, C. B., & Schwartz, W. C.
Affiliations
Oklahoma State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Education for Business
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2013-01
Volume
88
Issue
3
Pages
136-146
ISSN
  • 0883-2323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-3356
DOI
10.1080/08832323.2012.659296
OpenAlex
W2005812775
Cited by
49
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
12.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Education for Business (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting Education and Careers
  • Social Sciences › Education › Management and Marketing Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
Keywords
experiential learning, structured interviews, accounting education, student self-confidence, student anxiety, internal control, religious organizations, financial operations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancing Student Experiential Learning With Structured Interviews. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08832323.2012.659296
The paper
Cornell, R. M., Johnson, C. B., & Schwartz, W. C. (2013). Enhancing Student Experiential Learning With Structured Interviews. Journal of Education for Business. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2012.659296