The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Interpretation of Digital Trace Data in Communication and Social Computing Research
Abstract
The widespread availability of analytical tools for Big Data offers enormous opportunities and challenges for communication researchers. In contrast to user-generated texts, digital trace data (evidence of online user activities such as hyperlinks and retweets) represent a new methodological frontier for the field. However, interpretive strategies remain scattered and ad hoc with few best practices to guide them. To help remedy this situation, this article reviews recent scholarship in both communication and social computing research that has incorporated three common types of trace data: hyperlinks, Twitter followers, and retweets. It finds that while researchers in both fields have interpreted each trace in a variety of ways, they have largely declined to explain the validity of their interpretations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Norms are also sensitive to context, as the meaning of the same action or mechanism may change under different circumstances”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Freelon, 2014
In the citing paper
“However, this assumption has been challenged due to concerns with construct validity and stability over time (Freelon, 2014; Lazer, 2015).”
From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Freelon, 2014
Citations
Cites
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251
(1999) · Cited by 12,854
What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772751 · Cited by 6,652
(2011) · Cited by 5,203
I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience
Marwick, A. E., & boyd, D. (2011) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444810365313 · Cited by 4,612
Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. L. (2007) · doi:10.1145/1348549.1348556 · Cited by 2,662
Information credibility on twitter
Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., & Poblete, B. (2011) · Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1963405.1963500 · Cited by 2,593
Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter
Boyd, D., Golder, S., & Lotan, G. (2010) · 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.1109/hicss.2010.412 · Cited by 2,051
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
(2018) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/(issn)1083-6101 · Cited by 1,894
Weng, J., Lim, E., Jiang, J., & He, Q. (2010) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/1718487.1718520 · Cited by 1,780
Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter
Bakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A., & Watts, D. J. (2011) · Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining · doi:10.1145/1935826.1935845 · Cited by 1,689
Talking about tactile experiences
Obrist, M., Seah, S. A., & Subramanian, S. (2013) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2466220 · Cited by 1,634
Microblogging during two natural hazards events
Vieweg, S. E., Hughes, A., Starbird, K., & Palen, L. A. (2010) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1753326.1753486 · Cited by 1,485
Information, Community, and Action: How Nonprofit Organizations Use Social Media*
Lovejoy, K., & Saxton, G. D. (2012) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x · Cited by 1,297
Want to be Retweeted? Large Scale Analytics on Factors Impacting Retweet in Twitter Network
Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P. L. T., & Ed, H. (2010) · doi:10.1109/socialcom.2010.33 · Cited by 1,183
Who says what to whom on twitter
Wu, S., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W., & Watts, D. J. (2011) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/1963405.1963504 · Cited by 969
Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter
Zappavigna, M. S. (2011) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444810385097 · Cited by 734
Krishnamurthy, B., Gill, P., & Arlitt, M. (2008) · Proceedings of the first workshop on Online social networks · doi:10.1145/1397735.1397741 · Cited by 697
Uncovering social spammers: social honeypots + machine learning
Lee, K., Caverlee, J., & Webb, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval · doi:10.1145/1835449.1835522 · Cited by 619
Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign
Larsson, A. O., & Moe, H. (2011) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444811422894 · Cited by 598
McMillan, S. J. (2000) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/107769900007700107 · Cited by 588
Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on #Egypt
Meraz, S., & Papacharissi, Z. (2013) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161212474472 · Cited by 584
Social Computing: From Social Informatics to Social Intelligence
Wang, F., Carley, K. M., Zeng, D. D., & Mao, W. (2007) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2007.41 · Cited by 568
Modeling Information Diffusion in Implicit Networks
Yang, J., & Leskovec, J. (2010) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2010.22 · Cited by 563
Theory and Research in Mass Communication
Bryant, J., & Miron, D. (2004) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02650.x · Cited by 545
DIGITAL MEDIA AND THE PERSONALIZATION OF COLLECTIVE ACTION
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2011) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2011.579141 · Cited by 507
DON’T FOLLOW ME - Spam Detection in Twitter
Wang, A. H. (2010) · International Conference on Security and Cryptography · doi:10.5220/0002996201420151 · Cited by 469
Predicting Flu Trends using Twitter data
Achrekar, H., Gandhe, A., Lazarus, R. M., Yu, S.-H., & Liu, B. (2011) · IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS) · doi:10.1109/infcomw.2011.5928903 · Cited by 456
Small, T. A. (2011) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2011.554572 · Cited by 433
Teevan, J. B., Ramage, D., & Morris, M. R. (2011) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/1935826.1935842 · Cited by 372
Validity Issues in the Use of Social Network Analysis with Digital Trace Data
University of Texas at Austin, Howison, J., Wiggins, A., Syracuse University, Crowston, K., & Syracuse University (2011) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00282 · Cited by 369
Weblogs and the Epistemology of the News: Some Trends in Online Journalism
Matheson, D. (2004) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/146144804044329 · Cited by 357
The Presentation of Self in Virtual Life: Characteristics of Personal Home Pages
Papacharissi, Z. (2002) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/107769900207900307 · Cited by 350
Examining the New Influencers: A Self-Presentation Study of A-List Blogs
Sweetser, K. D., & Keshelashvili, A. (2005) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/107769900508200413 · Cited by 335
SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH METHODS IN INTERNET TIME
Karpf, D. (2012) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.665468 · Cited by 312
Content Analysis of the World Wide Web
Weare, C., & Lin, W. (2000) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/089443930001800304 · Cited by 306
Chadwick, A. (2010) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161210384730 · Cited by 286
New media, new movements? The role of the internet in shaping the ‘anti‐globalization’ movement
Aelst, P. V., & Walgrave, S. (2002) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/13691180208538801 · Cited by 281
The Temporal Effects of Story and Statistical Evidence on Belief Change
Baesler, E. J., & Burgoon, J. K. (1994) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365094021005002 · Cited by 273
TWITTER AS A TECHNOLOGY FOR AUDIENCING AND FANDOM
Highfield, T., Harrington, S., & Bruns, A. (2013) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.756053 · Cited by 272
Ausserhofer, J., & Maireder, A. (2013) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.756050 · Cited by 252
Different Aspects of Social Network Analysis
Jamali, M., & Abolhassani, H. (2006) · IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence · doi:10.1109/wi.2006.61 · Cited by 242
Measuring behavioral trust in social networks
Adalı, S., Escriva, R., Goldberg, M., Hayvanovych, M., Magdon‐Ismail, M., Szymanski, B. K., Wallace, W. A., & Williams, G. T. (2010) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI) · doi:10.1109/isi.2010.5484757 · Cited by 210
Without You, I'm Nothing: Performances of the Self on Twitter
Papacharissi, Z. (2012) · International journal of communication · Cited by 201
Using Twitter for Promotion and Branding: A Content Analysis of Local Television Twitter Sites
Greer, C. F., & Ferguson, D. A. (2011) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2011.570824 · Cited by 199
The Empirical Study of the Persuasive Effects of Evidence The Status After Fifty Years of Research
REINARD, J. C. (1988) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1988.tb00170.x · Cited by 199
Political Communication Faces the 21st Century
Graber, D. Α., & Smith, J. M. (2005) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/55.3.479 · Cited by 198
Wall, M. A. (2005) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/1464884905051006 · Cited by 179
The Emerging Viewertariat and BBC Question Time
Anstead, N., & O’Loughlin, B. (2011) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161211415519 · Cited by 171
National Borders on the World Wide Web
Halavais, A. (2000) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614440022225689 · Cited by 168
Rzeczpospolita blogow [Republic of Blog]: Examining Polish Bloggers Through Content Analysis
Sweetser, K. D., Tarkowski, A., Hofmokl, J., & Sapp, A. M. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00032.x · Cited by 154
Robinson, S. E. (2006) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/1464884906059428 · Cited by 153
Dimitrova, D. V., Kaid, L. L., Williams, A. P. J. W., & Sweetser, K. D. (2005) · Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1081180x05275595 · Cited by 132
Vocal Minority Versus Silent Majority: Discovering the Opionions of the Long Tail
Mustafaraj, E., Finn, S., Whitlock, C., & Metaxas, P. (2011) · International Conference on Social Computing · doi:10.1109/passat/socialcom.2011.188 · Cited by 131
Structural Predictors of Tie Formation in Twitter: Transitivity and Mutuality
Golder, S. A., & Yardi, S. (2010) · doi:10.1109/socialcom.2010.22 · Cited by 127
Live research: Twittering an election debate
Elmer, G. (2012) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444812457328 · Cited by 110
Linking online news and social media
Tsagkias, M., de Rijke, M., & Weerkamp, W. (2011) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/1935826.1935906 · Cited by 102
Analyzing Linking Practices: Candidate Sites in the 2002 US Electoral Web Sphere
Foot, K., Schneider, S. M., Dougherty, M., Xenos, M. A., & Larsen, E. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00220.x · Cited by 99
(2019) · IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications · doi:10.1109/mcg.2019.2922021 · Cited by 93
Early online identification of attention gathering items in social media
Mathioudakis, M., Koudas, N., & Marbach, P. (2010) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/1718487.1718525 · Cited by 50
Characterizing comment spam in the blogosphere through content analysis
Bhattarai, A., Rus, V., & Dasgupta, D. (2009) · doi:10.1109/cicybs.2009.4925088 · Cited by 48
THE UK ANTI-WAR MOVEMENT ONLINE
Gillan, K. (2009) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/13691180802158532 · Cited by 46
A Study on Social Network Metrics and Their Application in Trust Networks
Varlamis, I., Eirinaki, M., & Louta, M. D. (2010) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1109/asonam.2010.40 · Cited by 45
Wall, M. A. (2005) · Cited by 44
Reading and Writing Public Documents
(2001) · Document design companion series · doi:10.1075/ddcs.1 · Cited by 41
Building Frames Link by Link: The Linking Practices of Blogs and News Sites
Coddington, M. (2012) · International journal of communication · Cited by 33
A co-classification framework for detecting web spam and spammers in social media web sites
Chen, F., Tan, P., & Jain, A. K. (2009) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/1645953.1646235 · Cited by 32
Hoeken, H. (2001) · Document design companion series · doi:10.1075/ddcs.1.08hoe · Cited by 29
Bakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W., & Watts, D. J. (2011) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · Cited by 20
Metrics For Monitoring A Social-Political Blogosphere: A Malaysian Case Study
Ulicny, B. E., Kokar, M. M., & Matheus, C. J. (2010) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2010.22 · Cited by 16
Moe, H. (2012) · International journal of communication · Cited by 12
Mapping the Blogosphere with RSS-Feeds
Broß, J., Quasthoff, M., Berger, P., Hennig, P., & Meinel, C. (2010) · International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA) · doi:10.1109/aina.2010.95 · Cited by 12
Convincing citizens: The role of argument quality
Hoeken, H. (2001) · Radboud Repository (Radboud University) · Cited by 8
Latter-Day Tweets: TheMormon Times's Use of Twitter as a Reporting Tool
Boyle, K. (2012) · Journal of Media and Religion · doi:10.1080/15348423.2012.730320 · Cited by 5
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Coddington M., 2012, International Journal of Communication, 6, 2007
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02682.x · DOI
- Manyika J., 2011, McKinsey Global Institute, 1
- Moe H., 2012, International Journal of Communication, 6, 1222
- Papacharissi Z., 2012, International Journal of Communication, 6, 1989
- Wilson C., 2011, International Journal of Communication, 5
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Baumgartner, J., Zannettou, S., Keegan, B., Squire, M., & Blackburn, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7347 · Cited by 881
Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kıcıman, E. (2019) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2019.00013 · Cited by 763
“Norms are also sensitive to context, as the meaning of the same action or mechanism may change under different circumstances (Freelon, 2014).”
BackgroundTufekci, Z. (2014) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14517 · Cited by 780
Quantifying the power and consequences of social media protest
Freelon, D., McIlwain, C. D., & Clark, M. D. (2016) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816676646 · Cited by 392
Self-citationBoumans, J. W., & Trilling, D. (2015) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2015.1096598 · Cited by 248
Metadata
- Authors
- Freelon, D.
- Affiliations
- American University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Freelon, Deen
- ORCID
- Freelon, Deen
- Venue
- Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-01-02
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-75
- ISSN
- 0883-8151 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6878
- OpenAlex
- W2074336863
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 52.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Digital Humanities and Scholarship
- Keywords
- digital traces, interpretive strategies, hyperlinks, Twitter followers, retweets, social computing, communication research methods, big data, validity of interpretation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
