The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Children's wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters
Abstract
Children aged 7 to 12 were interviewed about their favorite TV character. Nearly all boys and about half of the girls selected same‐sex favorites. Regression analyses used perceived character traits (attractiveness, strength, humor, intelligence, social behavior) to predict wishful identification and parasocial interaction with characters. For male characters, wishful identification was predicted by intelligence and (for girls only) humor; parasocial interaction was predicted by intelligence, attractiveness, and (for boys only) strength. In marked contrast, for female characters (chosen only by girls), attractiveness was the only significant predictor. Although girls rated female characters as more intelligent than male characters, this trait apparently was not an important determinant of attraction. Interpretations of the findings and implications for socialization effects are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction
Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956) · Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049 · Cited by 4,380
Attribution in Social and Parasocial Relationships
PERSE, E. M., & RUBIN, R. B. (1989) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365089016001003 · Cited by 559
Cited by
Defining Identification: A Theoretical Look at the Identification of Audiences With Media Characters
Cohen, J. (2001) · Mass Communication and Society · doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0403_01 · Cited by 1,928
Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x · Cited by 1,365
Parasocial Interaction: A Review of the Literature and a Model for Future Research
Giles, D. C. (2002) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0403_04 · Cited by 1,245
Conceptualizing media enjoyment as attitude: implications for mass media effects research.
Nabi, R. L., & Krcmar, M. (2004) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00316.x · Cited by 327
Antecedents and Effects of Parasocial Relationships: A Meta-Analysis
Tukachinsky, R., Walter, N., & Saucier, C. J. (2020) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqaa034 · Cited by 212
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoffner, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 389-402
- ISSN
- 0883-8151 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6878
- OpenAlex
- W1999262850
- Cited by
- 520
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 89.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Children's wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08838159609364360
- The paper
- Hoffner, C. (1996). Children's wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159609364360
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
