The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research about inclusive education in 2020 – How can we improve our theories in order to change practice?
Open accessAbstract
Since the Salamanca Statement was published in 1994 a massive amount of research has addressed the issue of inclusive education. Yet, there is a sense of lack of progress which seems to necessitate a critical look at the field while not neglecting advancements made. Such advancements concern the development of theory, a concept which is given a broad interpretation in the paper. Both theories with limited scope and more encompassing theories have been developed. However, from the point of view of Lewin´s well-known formulation ‘there is nothing as practical as a good theory’ there seems to be a lack of theories that have empirically been shown to be successful tools in the development of more inclusive school systems, schools and classrooms. The case study seems to be a methodological approach well suited for the development of such theories. Two examples from Sweden, one from the school level and one from the classroom level, are used to illustrate the potential of case-studies to develop theory in this area of research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Chaiklin, H. (1991) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199102000-00025 · Cited by 39,535
Five misunderstandings about case-study research
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800405284363 · Cited by 14,266
Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers.
Price, D. O., Lewin, K., & Cartwright, D. (1951) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2087618 · Cited by 3,501
Teachers' attitudes towards integration / inclusion: a review of the literature
Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002) · European Journal of Special Needs Education · doi:10.1080/08856250210129056 · Cited by 2,026
Regular primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: a review of the literature
de Boer, A., Pijl, S. J., & Minnaert, A. (2011) · International Journal of Inclusive Education · doi:10.1080/13603110903030089 · Cited by 1,267
Teacher Perceptions of Mainstreaming/Inclusion, 1958–1995: A Research Synthesis
Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1996) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/001440299606300106 · Cited by 1,020
Co-Teaching in Inclusive Classrooms: A Metasynthesis of Qualitative Research
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & McDuffie, K. A. (2007) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/001440290707300401 · Cited by 903
Educational psychology and the effectiveness of inclusive education/mainstreaming
Lindsay, G. (2007) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/000709906x156881 · Cited by 725
Slee, R. (2011) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203831564 · Cited by 696
Metadata
- Authors
- Nilholm, C.
- Venue
- European Journal of Special Needs Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-04-19
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 358-370
- ISSN
- 0885-6257 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-591X
- OpenAlex
- W3017596665
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 42.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Research about inclusive education in 2020 – How can we improve our theories in order to change practice? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08856257.2020.1754547
- The paper
- Nilholm, C. (2021). Research about inclusive education in 2020 – How can we improve our theories in order to change practice? European Journal of Special Needs Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2020.1754547
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.