Cited by 65Temporomandibular Joint DisordersOrthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsOccupational health in dentistry

Effect of a Passive Jaw Motion Device on Pain and Range of Motion in TMD Patients Not Responding to Flat Plane Intraoral Appliances

Maloney, George E., Mehta, Noshir, Forgione, Albert G., Zawawi, Khalid H., Al-Badawi, Emad A., Driscoll, Stephen E.·2002·CRANIO®

Abstract

This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of a passive jaw motion device, the Therabite, and wooden tongue depressors (WTD), in patients with temporomandibular joint and muscle disorders, who did not improve after manual manipulation of the mandible and flat bite plane therapy. Forty-three patients were enrolled in the study and were classified as joint or muscle groups according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD. Twenty-four were assigned to the joint group, and 19 patients were assigned to the muscle group. The patients were assigned at random to three treatment subgroups: 1. passive jaw motion device therapy (Therabite); 2. wooden tongue depressors therapy (WTD); and 3. control group. All subjects received flat bite plane appliance therapy throughout the treatment period. Mandibular range of motion was measured for maximum opening (MO), right and left lateral (Rt. Lateral, Lt. Lateral) and protrusive (Pr) movements. Pain level was also assessed at the beginning and at the end of the treatment. The results suggested that a passive jaw motion device is effective in increasing range of motion in both groups of temporomandibular disorder patients, joint (intracapsular) and muscle (extracapsular). It also appears to decrease pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders. Pain was relieved to a greater degree in the muscle group than the joint group.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08869634.2002.11746191

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maloney, G. E., Mehta, N., Forgione, A. G., Zawawi, K. H., Al-Badawi, E. A., & Driscoll, S. E.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Zawawi, Khalid H.
Venue
CRANIO®
Published
2002-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
55-66
ISSN
  • 0734-5410 (ISSN-L)
  • 0886-9634
  • 2151-0903
OpenAlex
W3958970
Cited by
65
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CRANIO® (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Laboratory Technology › Occupational health in dentistry
Keywords
temporomandibular disorders, mandibular range of motion, orofacial pain, Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD, mandibular movement
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Dental Occlusion, Equipment Design, Facial Pain, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Mandible, Manipulation, Orthopedic, Masticatory Muscles, Movement, Pain Measurement, Statistics as Topic, Temporomandibular Joint, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Motion Therapy, Continuous Passive, Range of Motion, Articular, Treatment Outcome, Occlusal Splints, Craniomandibular Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review