The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-regulation and Self-management in Asthma: Exploring The Role of Illness Perceptions and Treatment Beliefs in Explaining Non-adherence to Preventer Medication
Abstract
The present study was designed to evaluate the degree to which variations in reported adherence to preventer medication for asthma could be explained by two sets of beliefs: perceptions of asthma and perceptions of asthma medication (beliefs about its necessity and concerns over its use). It also begins the empirical testing of an extended self-regulatory model, which includes treatment beliefs as well as illness perceptions. Using a cross-sectional design, 100 community-based patients completed validated questionnaires assessing their perceptions of asthma, beliefs about preventer inhalers and reported adherence to them. The findings showed that non-adherent behaviours were associated with doubts about the necessity of medication and concerns about its potential adverse effects and with more negative perceived consequences of illness. A hierarchical linear regression analysis revealed that socio-demographic and clinical factors explained only a small amount of variance in adherence whereas illness perceptions and treatment beliefs were both more substantial independent predictors. The best fit Amos analysis showed that illness perceptions influenced adherence both directly and indirectly via treatment beliefs, which, in turn, were the strongest predictors. The findings lend preliminary support for an extended self-regulatory model of treatment adherence, which incorporates beliefs about treatment as well as illness perceptions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Leventhal, H., Diefenbach, M., & Leventhal, E. A. (1992) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/bf01173486 · Cited by 1,573
One size does not fit all: the case for tailoring print materials
Kreuter, M. W., Strecher, V. J., & Glassman, B. (1999) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf02895958 · Cited by 831
Common-sense models of illness: The example of hypertension.
Meyer, D., Leventhal, H., & Gutmann, M. (1985) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//0278-6133.4.2.115 · Cited by 641
Cited by
The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire
Broadbent, E., Petrie, K. J., Main, J., & Weinman, J. (2006) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020 · Cited by 3,431
Self-citationA Meta-Analytic Review of the Common-Sense Model of Illness Representations
Hagger, M. S., & Orbell, S. (2003) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/088704403100081321 · Cited by 1,607
Horne, R., Chapman, S. C. E., Parham, R., Freemantle, N., Forbes, A., & Cooper, V. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080633 · Cited by 1,174
Self-citationPatient Adherence to Tuberculosis Treatment: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research
Munro, S. A., Lewin, S. A., Smith, H. J., Engel, M. E., Fretheim, A., & Volmink, J. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040238 · Cited by 1,080
Chan, A. H. Y., Horne, R., Hankins, M., & Chisari, C. (2020) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bcp.14193 · Cited by 523
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Horne, R., & Weinman, J.
- Venue
- Psychology & Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-32
- ISSN
- 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-8321
- OpenAlex
- W1974110731
- Cited by
- 869
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-regulation and Self-management in Asthma: Exploring The Role of Illness Perceptions and Treatment Beliefs in Explaining Non-adherence to Preventer Medication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08870440290001502
- The paper
- Horne, R., & Weinman, J. (2002). Self-regulation and Self-management in Asthma: Exploring The Role of Illness Perceptions and Treatment Beliefs in Explaining Non-adherence to Preventer Medication. Psychology & Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440290001502
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.