Cited by 127Diabetes Management and EducationBehavioral Health and InterventionsHealth and Wellbeing Research

Beyond good intentions: The role of proactive coping in achieving sustained behavioural change in the context of diabetes management

Open access
Thoolen, Bart Johan, Ridder, Denise de, Bensing, Jozien, Gorter, Kees, Rutten, Guy·2009·Psychology & Health

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of a brief self-management intervention to support patients recently diagnosed with type-2 diabetes to achieve sustained improvements in their self-care behaviours. Based on proactive coping, the intervention emphasizes the crucial role of anticipation and planning in maintaining self-care behaviours. In a randomised controlled trial among recent screen-detected patients, participants who received the intervention were compared with usual-care controls, examining changes in proximal outcomes (intentions, self-efficacy and proactive coping), self-care behaviour (diet, physical activity and medication) and weight over time (0, 3 and 12 months). Subsequently, the contribution of proactive coping in predicting maintenance of behavioural change was analysed using stepwise hierarchical regression analyses, controlling for baseline self-care behaviour, patient characteristics, and intentions and self-efficacy as measured after the course. The intervention was effective in improving proximal outcomes and behaviour with regard to diet and physical activity, resulting in significant weight loss at 12 months. Furthermore, proactive coping was a better predictor of long-term self-management than either intentions or self-efficacy. Proactive coping thus offers new insights into behavioural maintenance theory and can be used to develop effective self-management interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08870440701864504

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Daily self-management imposes a significant burden on patients with T2DM, often leading to increased emotional distress and feelings of being overwhelmed.

    “However, the demanding character of daily self-management imposes a significant burden on patients with T2DM. Adopting new healthier habits, along with the need for constant blood glucose monitoring and medication adherence, often leads to increased emotional distress and feelings of being overwhelmed [6,11-13].”

    From Evaluation of the Impact of Mobile Health App Vitadio in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial (2025) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Introduction (p. 2) describes daily self-management in type-2 diabetes as a difficult, potentially daunting task that can affect family, work and social life. The Notes (p. 10) report distress in some patient groups, but do not establish that adopting healthier habits, monitoring glucose and taking medication often lead to increased emotional distress or feelings of being overwhelmed. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thoolen, B. J., Ridder, D. D., Bensing, J., Gorter, K., & Rutten, G.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Thoolen, Bart Johan
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
2009-03
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
237-254
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W1973255064
Cited by
127
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
Keywords
proactive coping, type 2 diabetes, diabetes self-management, self-care behavior, self-efficacy, behavioral intention, screen-detected diabetes, diet, physical activity, medication adherence, weight loss, anticipatory planning
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Behavioral Medicine, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Intention, Risk Reduction Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review