Cited by 17Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentStress Responses and CortisolFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Effects of a prevention program for divorced families on youth cortisol reactivity 15 years later

Open access
Luecken, Linda J., Hagan, Melissa J., Mahrer, Nicole E., Wolchik, Sharlene A., Sandler, Irwin N., Tein, Jenn-Yun·2015·Psychology & Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined whether an empirically based, randomised controlled trial of a preventive intervention for divorced mothers and children had a long-term impact on offspring cortisol regulation. DESIGN: Divorced mothers and children (age 9-12) were randomly assigned to a literature control condition or the 11-week New Beginnings Program, a family-focused group preventive intervention for mothers and children in newly divorced families. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fifteen years after the trial, offspring salivary cortisol (n = 161) was measured before and after a social stress task. RESULTS: Multilevel mixed models were used to predict cortisol from internalizing symptoms, externalizing symptoms, group assignment and potential moderators of intervention effects. Across the sample, higher externalizing symptoms were associated with lower cortisol reactivity. There was a significant group-by-age interaction such that older offspring in the control group had higher reactivity relative to the intervention group, and younger offspring in the control group exhibited a decline across the task relative to younger offspring in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: Preventive interventions for youth from divorced families may have a long-term impact on cortisol reactivity to stress. Results highlight the importance of examining moderators of program effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08870446.2014.983924

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 17

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Dawson-McClure S Sandler IN Wolchik SA Millsap RE Prediction and reduction of risk for children of divorce: A six-year longitudinal study Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 2004 32 175 190 15164859
  2. Sauer B Brookhart MA Roy JA Vanderweele TJ Venentgas P Dreyer NA Nourjah P Smith SR Torchia MM Covariate selection Developing a Protocol for Observational Comparitive Effectiveness Research: A User's Guide 2013 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville, MD 23469377
  3. Wolchik SA Sandler IN Millsap RE Plummer BA Greene SM Anderson ER Six-year followup of preventive interventions for children of divorce Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2002 68 843 856
  4. Wolchik S Sandler IN Tein JY Mahrer NE Millsap RE Winslow E Velez C Porter MM Luecken LJ Reed A Prevention of mental and substance abuse disorders in young adults who experienced parental divorce fifteen years earlier: Results of a randomized trial Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2013 81 660 673 23750466 PMC3805366

Authors
Luecken, L. J., Hagan, M. J., Mahrer, N. E., Wolchik, S. A., Sandler, I. N., & Tein, J.-Y.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Luecken, Linda J.
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
2014-12-03
Volume
30
Issue
7
Pages
751-769
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W2029351636
Cited by
17
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • This research was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (5R01MH071707, 5P30MH068685, 5P30MH039246)
  • Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier (NCT01407120)
  • The funding source had no role in study design, collection, analysis, interpretation or writing of the report, or in the decision to submit the article for publication. The authors have no financial interest in the application of this research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
parental divorce, salivary cortisol, cortisol response, stress response, children of divorce, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, long-term intervention effects, age differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Child, Divorce, Family Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Mothers, Saliva, Stress, Psychological, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review