Cited by 75Cleft Lip and Palate ResearchCraniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

Psychological adjustment to craniofacial conditions (excluding oral clefts): A review of the literature

Open access
Feragen, Kristin Billaud, Stock, Nicola Marie·2017·Psychology & Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A congenital craniofacial anomaly (CFA) is expected to impact upon several domains of psychological, emotional and social functioning, yet no recent reviews have comprehensively summarised the available literature. Further, existing reviews tend to draw upon literature in the field of cleft lip and palate, and do not give substantive attention to other types of CFAs. DESIGN: A review of 41 papers published between January 2000 and March 2016 pertaining to psychological adjustment to CFAs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Findings are presented according to key psychological domains: General Psychological Well-being, Quality of Life, Behaviour, Emotional Well-being, Social Experiences, Appearance, and Treatment-Related Experiences. RESULTS: Current literature offers a contradictory picture of adjustment to CFAs. Psychological adjustment appeared to be comparable to norms and reference groups in approximately half of the papers related to non-syndromic CFAs, while more variation was found across domains among samples with syndromic CFAs. Associations were found between adjustment, physical health and cognitive function in several papers. The review identified a number of gaps in the literature, such as the inclusion of a wide range of diagnoses within research samples. CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates the complexity of findings, both within and across domains, and highlights a number of methodological challenges.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08870446.2016.1247838

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Caregivers of children born with a craniofacial condition tend to rate their child as having elevated emotional, conduct and hyperactivity difficulties.

    “Caregivers of children born with a craniofacial condition also tend to rate their child as having elevated emotional, conduct and hyperactivity difficulties (Feragen & Stock, 2017;Branson et al., 2024).”

    From Psychological Flexibility in Caregivers of Children With Congenital Craniofacial Conditions in the United Kingdom. (2026) · cites this paper as Feragen & Stock, 2017

    The Behavioural conduct section reports elevated parent-rated behavioural problems for some children with syndromic craniosynostoses, and the Emotional Functioning section reports concerns for some syndromic groups. But findings vary by condition: the review also reports normal-range emotional and behavioural outcomes in several groups, and it does not establish elevated hyperactivity difficulties across children with craniofacial conditions generally. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

12 of the 99 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Broder, H. L. (1997). Psychological research of children with craniofacial anomalies: Review, critique, and implications for the future. The Cleft Palate -Craniofacial Journal, 34, 402-4.
  2. Furman, W., & Shaffer, L. (2003). The role of romantic relationships in adolescent development. In: Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, USA (2003), pp. 3-22.
  3. Grogan, S. (2008). Body Image: Understanding body dissatisfaction in men, women, and children. Routledge.
  4. Okkerse, J. M., Beemer, F. A., Cordia-de Haan, M., Heineman-de Boer, J. A., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Wolters, W. H. (2001). Facial attractiveness and facial impairment ratings in children with craniofacial malformations. The Cleft Palate -Craniofacial Journal, 38, 386-392. doi: 10.1597/1545- 1569(2001)038<0386:faafir>2.0.co;2 · DOI
  5. Seaton, C. L. (2009). Psychological adjustment. In S. J. Lopez (Ed), The encyclopedia of positive psychology. Blackwell: reference online. doi: 10.1111/b.9781405161251.2009.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feragen, K. B., & Stock, N. M.
Affiliations
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • University of the West of England (GB)
Corresponding author
Feragen, Kristin Billaud
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
2016-12-07
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
253-288
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W2560387566
Cited by
75
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Cleft Lip and Palate Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Keywords
congenital craniofacial anomalies, psychological adjustment, psychological well-being, quality of life, emotional well-being, social functioning, appearance, physical health, cognitive function
MeSH terms
Emotional Adjustment, Humans, Craniofacial Abnormalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review