The DOI matches its Crossref record; 172 of the 172 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Healthy diet: Health impact, prevalence, correlates, and interventions
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To discuss healthy diet from a psychological perspective by considering definitions of healthy diet in terms of consumer understanding; the health effects of specific dietary elements in terms of overweight and (chronic) illness; the prevalence of healthy diet; the psychological and environmental determinants of healthy diet; and the psychological interventions that have been designed to promote healthy diet. DESIGN: A systematic review of the psychological literature on healthy diet. RESULTS: Our findings suggest that consumers have a relatively poor understanding of a healthy diet. The literature also demonstrates that there is poor evidence on the health protective effects of single foods or nutrients. We further show that low SES is the single consistent risk factor for not adhering to a healthy diet. Our review of the literature on determinants demonstrates that intentions, habits, self-regulatory skills, and the social and physical environment are the most important determinants of a healthy diet, which are in turn amenable to change by intervention strategies with varying levels of effectiveness. Educational interventions generally show a limited effect on practising a healthy diet whereas interventions targeting habitual behaviour and/or the physical environment seem more promising. CONCLUSIONS: In view of the large number of people who are concerned about their diets and make attempts to change their dietary patterns, we conclude that it is crucial to gain a better understanding of both the automatic and environmental influences that are responsible for people not acting upon their good intentions for diet change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
RETRACTED: Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease with a Mediterranean Diet
Estruch, R., Ros, E., Salas-Salvadó, J., Covas, M.-I., Corella, D., Arós, F., Gómez-Gracia, E., Ruiz-Gutiérrez, V., Fiol, M., Lapetra, J., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1200303 · Cited by 4,257
RetractedReduced dietary salt for the prevention of cardiovascular disease
Taylor, R. S., Ashton, K. E., Moxham, T., Hooper, L., & Ebrahim, S. B. J. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009217 · Cited by 225
RetractedThe theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
(2011) · Cited by 14,317
Ng, M., Fleming, T., Robinson, M., Thomson, B., Graetz, N., Margono, C., Mullany, E. C., Biryukov, S., Abbafati, C., Abera, S. F., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60460-8 · Cited by 11,952
Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-0977 · Cited by 11,572
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627 · Cited by 7,176 · cited 1×
“Rewards, as an extrinsic motivator, may undermine intrinsic motivation to eat healthily, therefore only accomplishing short-lived or even opposite effects (Birch, Marlin, & Rotter, 1984; Deci et al., 1999; Newman & Taylor, 1992).”
BackgroundImplementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.493 · Cited by 5,478
Nutbeam, D. (2000) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/15.3.259 · Cited by 5,286
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
(2008) · Encyclopedia of Public Health · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5614-7_436 · Cited by 4,527
Cited by
Caloric Restriction Mimetics in Nutrition and Clinical Trials
Hofer, S. J., Davinelli, S., Bergmann, M., Scapagnini, G., & Madeo, F. (2021) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2021.717343 · Cited by 109
Discourses of ‘Good Food’: The commercialization of healthy and ethical eating
Eriksson, G., & Machin, D. (2020) · Discourse, Context & Media · doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100365 · Cited by 42
Distanced self-talk enhances goal pursuit to eat healthier
Furman, C. R., Kross, E., & Gearhardt, A. N. (2020) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702619896366 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- de Ridder, D., Kroese, F., Evers, C., Adriaanse, M., & Gillebaart, M.
- Venue
- Psychology & Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-04-27
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 907-941
- ISSN
- 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-8321
- OpenAlex
- W2608708799
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 172
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Healthy diet: Health impact, prevalence, correlates, and interventions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08870446.2017.1316849
- The paper
- de Ridder, D., Kroese, F., Evers, C., Adriaanse, M., & Gillebaart, M. (2017). Healthy diet: Health impact, prevalence, correlates, and interventions. Psychology & Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2017.1316849
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.