Cited by 11Impact of Technology on AdolescentsDigital Media and PhilosophyCyberloafing and Workplace Behavior

Understanding daily problematic social media use of young adults: the role of trait- and state-fear of missing out

Gao, Xuemei, Li, Jiayu, Bai, Xujia, Zhou, Yuhong, Jiang, Xintong·2026·Psychology & Health

Abstract

Fear of missing out (FoMO) is strongly associated with problematic social media use (PSMU) in young adults; however, little is known about the different roles of trait-FoMO and state-FoMO in PSMU. This longitudinal study used 9-consecutive-day ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to investigate the momentary association between state-FoMO and PSMU and to determine whether such association is moderated by trait-FoMO. We used EMA to measure three daily social media use variables (i.e. craving, time spent on social media, and daily social media self-control failure) to determine daily PSMU. 129 female undergraduates (Mage = 20.48, SD = 1.47) completed a total of 4290 EMA surveys. All main variables were significantly and positively correlated with each other at baseline. Multilevel models revealed that the association of momentary state-FoMO with PSMU was significantly positive. Furthermore, trait-FoMO only moderated the positive association between daily state-FoMO and craving. Specifically, trait-FoMO enhanced the influence of daily state-FoMO on craving, and individuals with lower state-FoMO were more susceptible to the effects of trait-FoMO than individuals with higher state-FoMO. Different implications of trait-FoMO and state-FoMO are discussed particularly regarding their potential to increase the risk of young adult PSMU.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08870446.2025.2491588

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gao, X., Li, J., Bai, X., Zhou, Y., & Jiang, X.
Affiliations
  • Southwest Jiaotong University (CN)
  • Southwest University (CN)
  • Northeast Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Gao, Xuemei
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
2025-04-12
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
864-876
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W4409380496
Cited by
10
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6
FWCI
17.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Social Science Foundation of China (19BSH112)
  • Chongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (226)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
Keywords
fear of missing out, social media addiction, young adults, moderation
MeSH terms
Self-Control, Ecological Momentary Assessment, Adolescent, Adult, Fear, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Students, Young Adult, Social Media, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review