Cited by 90Stress Responses and CortisolMedia Influence and HealthFilm in Education and Therapy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effect of motivational arousal through films on salivary immunoglobulin A

McClelland, David C., Kirshnit, Carol·1988·Psychology & Health

Abstract

One-hundred and thirty-two college students were exposed in small groups to two films which contrasted in the extent to which they aroused either power or affiliation motivation. In previous studies high power motivation, if it is inhibited, has been associated with lower levels of salivary immunoglobulin A (S-Ig A), and high affiliation motivation, if it is not inhibited, is associated with higher concentrations of S-Ig A. The film which aroused power motivation more was not followed by a decrease in S-Ig A concentrations as predicted, but the film was followed by a significant reduction in S-Ig A concentrations for those individuals with the inhibited power motive syndrome at baseline as compared to individuals characterized by other motive syndromes. The film which aroused affiliation motivation more was followed by an increase in S-Ig A concentrations immediately afterwards, and this increase was sustained an hour later when subjects continued to dwell on the loving relationships that characterized the film. Subjects characterized by the relaxed affiliative syndrome at baseline showed greater gains in S-Ig A in response to the film which aroused affiliative concerns. Although higher S-Ig A levels at baseline are associated with reports of less severe illness in the past among males, neither males nor females who showed consistent gains in S-Ig A after the affiliative film reported less severe illness in the past.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08870448808400343

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of 27 immune function studies, 15 (56%) found positive relationships or positive effects in response to an R/S intervention, and one (4%) found a negative effect.

    “of which 15 (56%) found positive relationships or positive effects in response to a R/S intervention, and one (4%) found a negative effect [436].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Jackson D. N., 1966, A modern strategy for personality assessment: The personality research form
  2. McClelland D. C., 1985, Human Motivation
  3. 10.1037/0021-843X.91.1.61 · DOI
  4. 10.1037/11144-000 · DOI
  5. McClelland D. C., 1983, Manual for the Competency Mood Profile (COMP)
  6. McKay J., 1986, Affiliative trust: a thematic coding system to assess states associated with gains in concentrations of salivary immunoglobulin A

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McClelland, D. C., & Kirshnit, C.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Loyola University Chicago (US)
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
1988-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
31-52
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W2033660248
Cited by
90
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Education › Film in Education and Therapy
Keywords
salivary IgA, power motivation, need for affiliation, film exposure, immune function, disease history, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review