CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 40ERP Systems Implementation and ImpactMulti-Criteria Decision MakingEfficiency Analysis Using DEA

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System Selection: A Data Envelopment Anaysis (DEA) Approach

Lall, Vinod, Teyarachakul, Sunantha·2006·Journal of Computer Information Systems
DOI 10.1080/08874417.2006.11645946
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Over the last five to eight years a large number of businesses worldwide have implemented Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems. ERP systems are a category of software that offer extensive support to manage business processes. They are application software that can be used in most kinds of businesses and organizations. Adoption and implementation of ERP systems involves risks and a large number of organizations have wasted millions of dollars as a result of failed implementations. Some of these failed implementations may be attributed to the selection of an ineffective ERP system. This paper applies Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to the process of selecting an ERP system.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08874417.2006.11645946

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Ahituv, N., S. Neumann, and M Zviran. “A System Development Methodology for ERP Systems,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, Spring 2002, pp. 56–67.
  2. Ande, S., L.M. Metzger, J. Kralewski, and D. Gans. “Measuring Efficiency of Physician Practices using Data Envelopment Analysis,” Managed Care, November 2002, pp. 48–56.
  3. Anderson, D.R., D.J. Sweeney, and T.A. Williams. “The Management Scientist,” Southwestern College Publishing, 2000.
  4. Brady, J.A., E.F. Monk, and B.J. Wagner. “Concepts in Enterprise Resource Planning,” Course Technology, 2001.
  5. Brooks, L. and S. Zeltmann. “SAP: Enterprise System and Training Model,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, Summer 1998, pp. 60–64.
  6. Fisher, D.M., S.A. Fisher, M.Y. Kiang, and R.T. Chi. “Evaluating Mid-level ERP Software,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, Fall 2004, pp. 38–45.
  7. Matthys, N. and J.D. Shorter. “Electronic Resource Planning Solutions for Business Processes,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, Fall 2000, pp. 45–49.
  8. McCombs, G.B. and M. Sharifi. “Design and Implementation of an ERP Oracle Financials Course,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, Winter 2002–2003, pp. 71–75.
  9. Robinson, A.G. and D.M. Ditts. “OR & ERP: A Match for the New Millennium,” OR/MS Today, June 1999, pp. 30–35.
  10. Thanassoulis, E., R.G. Dyson, and M.J. Foster. “Relative Efficiency Assessments Using Data Envelopment Analysis: An Application to Data Rates Departments,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1987, pp. 397–411.
  11. Verville, J. “Model of the ERP Acquisition Process,” Paper presented at DSI Orlando, November 2000.
  12. Zviran, M., N. Pliskin, and R. Levin. “Measuring User Satisfaction and Perceived Usefulness in the ERP Context,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, Spring 2005, pp. 43–52.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lall, V., & Teyarachakul, S.
Affiliations
Minnesota State University Moorhead (US)
ORCID
Teyarachakul, Sunantha
Venue
Journal of Computer Information Systems
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2006-09
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
123-127
ISSN
  • 0887-4417 (ISSN-L)
  • 2380-2057
DOI
10.1080/08874417.2006.11645946
OpenAlex
W2612002187
Cited by
39
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Computer Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of Computer Information Systems
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
Keywords
enterprise resource planning, ERP selection, data envelopment analysis, ERP implementation failure, business process management, software selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review