Hard Skill Gap between University Education and the Robotic Industry
Abstract
This study explores the technical skills gap between university education and the robotic industry in two phases. In phase one, interviews were conducted with 7 experts from the industry to find out five key technical aspects and the corresponding professional courses that are important for students before work. In phase two, based on experts’ responses to the questionnaires, an Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) was carried out. The results suggest that effort should be directed at improving the current courses on “Artificial Intelligence,” “Machine Vision,” and “Robot Structure Design” in university education. Authors call for further research to explore the gap from professors’ and students’ perspectives to gain a more comprehensive understanding of factors that should be considered in the planning of robotic talent training courses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A skill gap exists across different professions.
“Recent studies and reports indicate the presence of a skill gap across different professions [1,2]”
From Exploring the Impact of AI Tools on Cognitive Skills: A Comparative Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
Cites
Closing the Gap between Software Engineering Education and Industrial Needs
Garousi, V., Giray, G., Tuzun, E., Catal, C., & Felderer, M. (2020) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2018.2880823 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploring the Impact of AI Tools on Cognitive Skills: A Comparative Analysis
Musazade, N., Mezei, J., & Wang, X. (2025) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a18100631 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Recent studies and reports indicate the presence of a skill gap across different professions [1,2], with technological advancements considered one of the main causes of changing demand [3,4].”
- Authors
- Do, H.-D., Tsai, K.-T., Wen, J.-M., & Huang, S. K.
- Affiliations
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
- National United University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Wen, Ju-May
- Venue
- Journal of Computer Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-01-10
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-36
- ISSN
- 0887-4417 (ISSN-L)
- 2380-2057
- OpenAlex
- W4206432927
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9
- FWCI
- 7.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Computer Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
- Keywords
- skills gap, robotics industry, university education, technical skills, robotics education, curriculum development, artificial intelligence in education, machine vision, robot structural design, industry-education alignment, talent training
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review