Resistant starches as a vehicle for delivering health benefits to the human large bowel
Open accessAbstract
Non-starch polysaccharides (NSP; major components of dietary fibre) have been rather disappointing in the prevention and management of large bowel inflammatory diseases (IBD) or colorectal cancer (CRC). Resistant starch (RS) is that starch which escapes small intestinal digestion and enters the large bowel. RS contributes to total dietary fibre and could be as important as NSP in promoting large bowel health and preventing IBD and CRC. Indeed, it appears that some societies historically at low risk for these conditions eat relatively little NSP but have diets high in RS through their culinary practices. RS acts largely through its large bowel bacterial fermentation products which are, in adults, short chain fatty acids (SCFA). Collectively, SCFA have several non-specific positive actions on large bowel physiology including lowering of luminal pH. Of the major acids, butyrate has attracted the most attention. It is a major metabolic fuel for and promoter of a normal phenotype in colonocytes. Recent data from our laboratory support the latter suggestion. We have shown that, in rats, higher dietary protein (as casein, red meat or soy) increases colonocyte genetic damage and thinning of the colonic mucus barrier. However, feeding of RS as a high amylose maize starch opposed both of these changes in proportion to increased colonic butyrate. These data accord with prospective population data showing lower CRC risk with consumption of total dietary fibre. RS intakes appear to be low in most affluent industrialized countries, so increasing its consumption by modifying consumer foods is one strategy to improve public health. CSIRO and its partners are developing new high amylose cereal cultivars for this purpose. Colonic delivery of specific SCFA could also be useful clinically and we have shown that acetylated, propionylated and butyrylated starches resist small intestinal amylolysis. The bound SCFA are released by the large bowel microflora, raising their digesta levels, with the greatest increase being in the esterified acid. Feeding studies with butyrylated starch in rats have confirmed the opposition of diet-induced genetic damage, supporting a role for this SCFA in lowering risk of CRC and IBD. Further human and animal interventions are planned to determine the potential of these new types of RS in enhancing colonic health.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Butyrate is the major energy source for colonic epithelial cells and promotes a normal phenotype in colonocytes by repairing damaged DNA.
“Butyrate is the major energy source for the colonic epithelial cells and uniquely has the ability to promote a normal phenotype in colonocytes by repairing damaged DNA (Le Leu et al., 2005; Toden et al., 2007; Topping et al., 2008).”
From Role of polysaccharides in food, digestion, and health (2017) · cites this paper as Topping et al., 2008
Fermentation of RS results in higher levels of butyrate compared to NSPs.
“The fermentation of RS results in the production of higher levels of butyrate compared to NSPs (Topping and Clifton, 2001; Topping et al., 2008), while fermentation of arabinoxylan results in greater production of butyrate compared to fermentation of β-glucan (Hughes et al., 2007; 2008).”
From Role of polysaccharides in food, digestion, and health (2017) · cites this paper as Topping et al., 2008
Cites
Toden, S., Bird, A. R., Topping, D. L., & Conlon, M. A. (2006) · Cancer Biology & Therapy · doi:10.4161/cbt.5.3.2382 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Role of polysaccharides in food, digestion, and health
Lovegrove, A., Edwards, C. H., De Noni, I., Patel, H., El, S. N., Grassby, T., Zielke, C., Ulmius, M., Nilsson, L., Butterworth, P. J., et al. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2014.939263 · Cited by 606 · see citing works
“The fermentation of RS results in the production of higher levels of butyrate compared to NSPs (Topping and Clifton, 2001; Topping et al., 2008), while fermentation of arabinoxylan results in greater production of butyrate compared to fermentation of b-glucan (Hughes et al., 2007; 2008).”
BackgroundResult
- Authors
- Topping, D. L., Bajka, B. H., Bird, A. R., Clarke, J. M., Cobiac, L., Conlon, M. A., Morell, M. K., & Toden, S.
- Affiliations
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Preventitive Health National Research Flagship, Adelaide, Australia
- Food Futures National Research Flagship, Adelaide, Australia
- Flinders University (AU)
- Adelaide University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Topping, David L.
- Venue
- Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 103-108
- ISSN
- 0891-060X (ISSN-L)
- 1651-2235
- OpenAlex
- W2169516606
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
- Keywords
- resistant starch, dietary fiber, short-chain fatty acids, butyrate, colonic health, inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal cancer prevention, colonic fermentation, colonic mucus barrier, dietary protein, high-amylose starch, butyrylated starch, non-starch polysaccharides, luminal pH
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review