Green intentions, green actions: the power of social media and the perils of greenwashing
Abstract
The deteriorating environment necessitates immediate remedial measures to preserve life forms in their natural state. There is an urgent need to regulate anthropogenic activities. This scholarly work examined the factors that lead to environmentally friendly consumption among consumers. We extended the TPB model with additional variables, namely social media marketing (SMM) and environmental concern (EC) to investigate consumers’ green purchase behavior. Furthermore, the moderating effect of greenwashing (GW) was examined. Data from 388 respondents were analyzed using the PLS-SEM technique. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first empirical study to incorporate greenwashing as a moderating variable between GPI and GPB. Finally, the study discusses theoretical and managerial implications and outlines several strategies for marketers to promote green products and mitigate the negative effects of greenwashing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This dual-skepticism framework aids in reconciling inconsistent findings in the literature by differentiating state suspicion regarding a particular post (PGR) from trait resistance grounded in previous experience (PGE).
“This dual-skepticism framework aids in reconciling inconsistent findings in the literature by differentiating state suspicion regarding a particular post (PGR) from trait resistance grounded in previous experience (PGE) (de Sio et al., 2022;Nazish et al., 2025;Rehman et al., 2025;Skordoulis et al., 2025).”
From Cross-national evidence on influencer-driven green choice: a moderated-mediation model of authenticity, parasocial ties, and greenwashing exposure (2026) · cites this paper as Nazish et al., 2025
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 149 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Nazish, M., Khan, Z., Khan, A., Naved Khan, M., & Ramkissoon, H.
- Affiliations
- Aligarh Muslim University (IN)
- Jamia Millia Islamia (IN)
- Faculty of Management Studies and Research, Aligarh Muslim University
- University of South Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Khan, Zebran
- Venue
- Journal of Global Marketing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2024-11-22
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 214-233
- ISSN
- 0891-1762 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-6975
- OpenAlex
- W4404639668
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 149
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 12.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Global Marketing (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
- Keywords
- greenwashing, green purchase intention, green purchase behavior, social media marketing, environmental concern, theory of planned behavior, green products, consumer behavior, moderating effect
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review