Cited by 16T-cell and B-cell ImmunologyImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune DisordersLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment

The expanded double negative T cell populations of a patient with ALPS are not clonally related to CD4+ or to CD8+ T cells: BRIEF DEFINITE REPORT

Arnold, Marlies, Gaipl, Udo, Brunner, Juergen, Spriewald, Bernd, Herrmann, Martin, Haas, Johannes Peter·2007·Autoimmunity

Abstract

The autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS) is characterized by non-malignant lymphoproliferation and signs of autoimmunity. A hallmark of ALPS are high amounts of circulating CD3+/CD4-/CD8- double negative T-lymphocytes (DN T cells). The origin of these cells remains elusive. To investigate the relationships of DN T cells and the single positive T cell populations (CD4+ and CD8+), we analyzed by spectratyping the complementarity determining regions 3 (CDR3) of the T cell receptors in sorted "single positive" (CD4+, CD8+) and DN T cells in a patient with ALPS type 1a. We observed signs for clonal expansion in all three T cell subpopulations. Strong and weak clonal expansions were to be seen in 16 and 14 for DN, 6 and 12 for CD8+, and 1 and 5 for CD4 + T cells, respectively. Most importantly, 24 out of 30 aberrant peaks in the spectratype histograms of the DN T cells where unique for this population and were not to be detected in the histograms of the single positive T cells. In contrast to published data, we conclude that expanded DN T cell populations in ALPS are not generally derived from expanded CD3+/CD4+ or CD3+/CD8+ populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08916930701356473

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two unrelated HEM1-deficient patients displayed persistently elevated proportions of αβ double-negative T cells.

    “Two unrelated patients displayed persistently elevated proportions of αβ double-negative T (DNT) cells, an interesting comparison to the hallmark expansion of DNTs in autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome [8, 31, 32].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arnold, M., Gaipl, U., Brunner, J., Spriewald, B., Herrmann, M., & Haas, J. P.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE)
  • Universität Innsbruck (AT)
  • Universität Greifswald (DE)
Venue
Autoimmunity
Published
2007-01
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
299-301
ISSN
  • 0891-6934 (ISSN-L)
  • 1607-842X
OpenAlex
W2123547670
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autoimmunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome, double-negative T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, clonal expansion, T cell receptor CDR3, T cell origin, lymphoproliferation
MeSH terms
Adult, Autoimmune Diseases, Humans, Lymphoproliferative Disorders, Male, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, Syndrome, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, CD3 Complex, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review