Cited by 184Human-Animal Interaction StudiesSocial Robot Interaction and HRIAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

We Are Family: Viewing Pets as Family Members Improves Wellbeing

McConnell, Allen R., Paige Lloyd, E., Humphrey, Brandon T.·2019·Anthrozoös

Abstract

The current work investigated how viewing one’s pet as a family member improves wellbeing. We hypothesized that including pets in a key social ingroup (i.e., family) would increase ascriptions of socially supportive traits to these animals, enhancing their perceived ability to provide social support to owners, which in turn promotes owner wellbeing. Study 1 used a correlational design and showed positive relations between viewing one’s companion animal as a family member, greater perceptions of socially supportive traits, and better wellbeing as indexed by several measures of mental and physical health. Study 2 experimentally manipulated the extent to which participants viewed their pets as family members and found that inducing people to view companion animals as family members improved wellbeing. This study also provided evidence for the mediating role of socially supportive anthropomorphism, and it ruled out a mood-based alternative account. Pets can play an important role in providing social support that can improve people’s mental and physical health, and the processes underlying how animals can be included in people’s most important ingroup shed light on the psychology underlying how group memberships affect perceptions of humanity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08927936.2019.1621516

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pets are often an integral part of the family structure.

    “As noted by Bowen [78] and others [43,44,54,79,80,81], pets are often an integral part of the family structure.”

    From Disenfranchised Guilt-Pet Owners' Burden. (2022) · cites this paper as [44]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McConnell, A. R., Paige Lloyd, E., & Humphrey, B. T.
Affiliations
  • Miami University (US)
  • Department of Psychology, University of Denver, USA
Corresponding author
McConnell, Allen R.
Venue
Anthrozoös
Published
2019-06-28
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
459-470
ISSN
  • 0892-7936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-0377
OpenAlex
W2953918586
Cited by
184
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2
FWCI
8.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anthrozoös (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21HD095132)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
pets as family members, companion animals, anthropomorphism, social support, well-being, perceived social support, mental health, physical health, human-animal relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review