We Are Family: Viewing Pets as Family Members Improves Wellbeing
Abstract
The current work investigated how viewing one’s pet as a family member improves wellbeing. We hypothesized that including pets in a key social ingroup (i.e., family) would increase ascriptions of socially supportive traits to these animals, enhancing their perceived ability to provide social support to owners, which in turn promotes owner wellbeing. Study 1 used a correlational design and showed positive relations between viewing one’s companion animal as a family member, greater perceptions of socially supportive traits, and better wellbeing as indexed by several measures of mental and physical health. Study 2 experimentally manipulated the extent to which participants viewed their pets as family members and found that inducing people to view companion animals as family members improved wellbeing. This study also provided evidence for the mediating role of socially supportive anthropomorphism, and it ruled out a mood-based alternative account. Pets can play an important role in providing social support that can improve people’s mental and physical health, and the processes underlying how animals can be included in people’s most important ingroup shed light on the psychology underlying how group memberships affect perceptions of humanity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pets are often an integral part of the family structure.
“As noted by Bowen [78] and others [43,44,54,79,80,81], pets are often an integral part of the family structure.”
From Disenfranchised Guilt-Pet Owners' Burden. (2022) · cites this paper as [44]
Cites
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971 · see citing works
Social Relationships and Health
House, J. S., Landis, K. R., & Umberson, D. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3399889 · Cited by 7,073 · see citing works
A Measure of Subjective Happiness: Preliminary Reliability and Construct Validation
Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1023/a:1006824100041 · Cited by 4,071 · see citing works
On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.4.864 · Cited by 4,069 · see citing works
Dehumanization: An integrative review
Haslam, N. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4 · Cited by 2,919 · see citing works
Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1134475 · Cited by 2,342 · see citing works
Zadro, L., Williams, K. D., & Richardson, R. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.006 · Cited by 1,138 · see citing works
Epley, N., Akalis, S., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02056.x · Cited by 632 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kogan, L. R., Currin-McCulloch, J., Bussolari, C., Packman, W., & Erdman, P. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11072084 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Disenfranchised Guilt-Pet Owners' Burden.
Kogan, L. R., Bussolari, C., Currin-McCulloch, J., Packman, W., & Erdman, P. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12131690 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Canine Caregivers: Paradoxical Challenges and Rewards
Kogan, L. R., Wallace, J. E., Hellyer, P. W., & Carr, E. C. J. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12091074 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- McConnell, A. R., Paige Lloyd, E., & Humphrey, B. T.
- Affiliations
- Miami University (US)
- Department of Psychology, University of Denver, USA
- Corresponding author
- McConnell, Allen R.
- ORCID
- McConnell, Allen R.
- Venue
- Anthrozoös
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-06-28
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 459-470
- ISSN
- 0892-7936 (ISSN-L)
- 1753-0377
- OpenAlex
- W2953918586
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 8.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Anthrozoös (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21HD095132)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- pets as family members, companion animals, anthropomorphism, social support, well-being, perceived social support, mental health, physical health, human-animal relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review