The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reading the Rains: Local Knowledge and Rainfall Forecasting in Burkina Faso
Abstract
This article describes how farmers of Burkina Faso predict seasonal rainfall and examines how their forecasts relate to those produced by meteorological science. Farmers' forecasting knowledge encompasses shared and selective repertoires. Most farmers formulate expectations from observation of natural phenomena. Cultural and ritual spiritualists also predict rainfall from divination, visions, and dreams. Rather than positing local and scientific knowledge as self-exclusive, our research shows that farmers operate in multiple cognitive frameworks. Moreover, they are interested in receiving scientific information because they perceive local forecasts as becoming less reliable as a result of increasing climate variability. Some aspects of local forecasting knowledge, such as those stressing the relationship between temperatures, wind, and rainfall, can help explain meteorology-based forecasts. But significant discordance remains between scientific and local forecasts. The former predict total rainfall quantity at a regional scale, whereas the latter stress rainfall duration and distribution and are more attuned to crop-weather interactions. Local systems of thought stress the relationship between knowledge and social responsibility. This emphasizes the need for scientists to integrate information dissemination projects with efforts to improve farmers' capacity to respond to forecasts and to cope with suboptimal climate impacts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dismantling the Divide Between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge
Agrawal, A. (1995) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.1995.tb00560.x · Cited by 2,189
Cited by
Framework for integrating indigenous and scientific knowledge for disaster risk reduction
Mercer, J., Kelman, I., Taranis, L., & Suchet‐Pearson, S. (2010) · Disasters · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01126.x · Cited by 567
Hiwasaki, L., Luna, E., Syamsidik, & Shaw, R. (2014) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.07.007 · Cited by 444
Climate and Culture: Anthropology in the Era of Contemporary Climate Change
Crate, S. A. (2011) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104925 · Cited by 367
Farmers’ risk perception, vulnerability, and adaptation to climate change in rural Pakistan
Fahad, S., & Wang, J. (2018) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.018 · Cited by 292
Luseno, W. K., McPeak, J. G., Barrett, C. B., Little, P. D., & Gebru, G. (2003) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(03)00113-x · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Roncoli, C., Ingram, K., & Kirshen, P.
- Venue
- Society & Natural Resources
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 409-427
- ISSN
- 0894-1920 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0723
- OpenAlex
- W2076024567
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reading the Rains: Local Knowledge and Rainfall Forecasting in Burkina Faso. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08941920252866774
- The paper
- Roncoli, C., Ingram, K., & Kirshen, P. (2002). Reading the Rains: Local Knowledge and Rainfall Forecasting in Burkina Faso. Society & Natural Resources. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920252866774
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.