The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Farmers’ risk perception, vulnerability, and adaptation to climate change in rural Pakistan
Abstract
Pakistan is the world’s most susceptible country to extreme climatic events, such as floods and droughts. This study aims to investigate the risks related to climate variability and the adaptation measures utilized by farm households in their farms to cope with the adverse shocks of climatic disasters. A dataset of 600 respondents was collected using structured questionnaire from four districts namely Charsadda, Mardan, Nowshera and Peshawar of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan. Findings of the research showed that soil fertility loss, water scarcity, changes in crop yields and crop diseases were the main determinants of climate variability. Further study participants were also utilizing several adaptation techniques such as change in crop type and variety, change fertilizer, seed quality, pesticide, plant shade trees; water storage and farm diversification. Results of our study further showed that in the study area, study participants were facing various constraints in adoption of certain adaptation measures to deal with climate variability, such as shortage of labor, insecure land tenure system, lack of market access, poverty, land of governmental support, lack of access to assets, lack of water sources, lack of credit sources and lack of knowledge and information were the main constraints faced by the farm households. Findings of this research provide useful insights to the responsible authorities for policy implementation. Our study further suggests that the government should provide proper support to the farmers in the shape of access to farm inputs, access to information and extension services on climate variability and adaptation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate Change Impacts on Global Food Security
Wheeler, T., & von Braun, J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1239402 · Cited by 3,487
Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change
Adger, W. N. (2003) · Economic Geography · doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00220.x · Cited by 2,542
Global food security under climate change
Schmidhuber, J., & Tubiello, F. N. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701976104 · Cited by 2,128
Climate Change Vulnerability Assessments: An Evolution of Conceptual Thinking
Füssel, H.-M., & Klein, R. J. T. (2006) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-006-0329-3 · Cited by 1,994
Deressa, T. T., Hassan, R. M., Ringler, C., Alemu, T., & Yesuf, M. (2009) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.01.002 · Cited by 1,939
Theory and Practice in Assessing Vulnerability to Climate Change andFacilitating Adaptation
Kelly, P. M., & Adger, W. N. (2000) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1023/a:1005627828199 · Cited by 1,630
The Influence of Climate Change on Global Crop Productivity
Lobell, D. B., & Gourdji, S. M. (2012) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.112.208298 · Cited by 1,300
Adaptation to climate change in Ethiopia and South Africa: options and constraints
Bryan, E., Deressa, T. T., Gbetibouo, G. A., & Ringler, C. (2009) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2008.11.002 · Cited by 1,193
The impact of temperature variability on wheat yields
ASSENG, S., FOSTER, I., & TURNER, N. C. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02262.x · Cited by 1,053
Metadata
- Authors
- Fahad, S., & Wang, J.
- Venue
- Land Use Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 79
- Pages
- 301-309
- ISSN
- 0264-8377 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2888521917
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 14.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Farmers’ risk perception, vulnerability, and adaptation to climate change in rural Pakistan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.018
- The paper
- Fahad, S., & Wang, J. (2018). Farmers’ risk perception, vulnerability, and adaptation to climate change in rural Pakistan. Land Use Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.