CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 637Sustainability and Climate Change GovernanceConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementPublic Policy and Administration Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Governance Principles for Natural Resource Management

Open access
Lockwood, Michael, Davidson, Julie, Curtis, Allan, Stratford, Elaine, Griffith, Rod·2010·Society & Natural Resources
DOI 10.1080/08941920802178214
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Sustainable natural resource use and management make novel demands on governance arrangements, the design of which requires normative guidance. Although governance principles have been developed for diverse contexts, their availability for sustainable natural resource governance is so far limited. In response, we present a suite of governance principles for natural resource governance that, while developed in an Australian multilevel context, has general applicability and significance at local, subnational, and national scales. The principles can be used to direct the design of governance institutions that are legitimate, transparent, accountable, inclusive, and fair and that also exhibit functional and structural integration, capability, and adaptability. Together, they can also serve as a platform for developing governance monitoring and evaluation instruments, crucial for both self-assessment and external audit purposes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08941920802178214

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Bernstein , S. 2005 . Legitimacy in global environmental governance . J. Int. Law Int. Relations 1 : 139 – 166 .
  2. Davidson , J. , and E. Stratford . 2000 . Building the knowledge base of the social and institutional dimensions of natural resource management . Canberra , Australia : Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation .
  3. European Commission . 2001 . White paper on governance . Brussels , Belgium : European Commission .
  4. Habermas , J. 1981 . The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society . Boston : Beacon Press .
  5. 10.1080/714038553 · DOI
  6. 10.5040/9781350391215.ch-001 · DOI
  7. Kooiman , J. 2000 . Societal governance: Levels, modes, and orders of social-political interaction . In Debating governance , ed. J. Pierre , 138 – 164 . Oxford , UK : Oxford University Press .
  8. Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management . 2004 . Governance principles for sustainability: Application guidelines . Vancouver , Canada : Government of British Columbia .
  9. Moore , S. A. 2005 . Regional delivery of natural resource management in Australia: Is it democratic and does it matter? In Participation and governance in regional development , eds. R. Eversole and J. Martin , 121 – 136 . Aldershot , UK : Ashgate .
  10. 10.1080/01419870701356015 · DOI
  11. Pierre , J. 2000 . Introduction: Understanding governance . In Debating governance , ed. J. Pierre , 1 – 10 . New York : Oxford University Press .
  12. Roberts , P. 2000 . Strategic connectivity . In The new regionalism: Strategies and governance , ed. M. Nathan , 19 – 24 . Manchester , UK : Centre for Local Economic Strategies .
  13. Rosenau , J. N. 2000 . Change, complexity, and governance in globalizing space . In Debating governance , ed. J. Pierre , 167 – 200 . New York : Oxford University Press .
  14. Turnbull , W. 2005 . Evaluation of current governance arrangements to support regional investment under the NHT and NAP . Canberra , Australia : Departments of Environment and Heritage and Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–637 of 637

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lockwood, M., Davidson, J., Curtis, A., Stratford, E., & Griffith, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • Charles Sturt University (AU)
Corresponding author
Lockwood, Michael
ORCID
Venue
Society & Natural Resources
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2010-07-19
Volume
23
Issue
10
Pages
986-1001
ISSN
  • 0894-1920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0723
DOI
10.1080/08941920802178214
OpenAlex
W2101089990
Cited by
630
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 16
FWCI
13.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Society & Natural Resources (publishedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (acceptedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
natural resource governance, governance principles, sustainable natural resource use, multi-level governance, institutional design, legitimacy, transparency, accountability, inclusivity, fairness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review