The Tragedy of Becoming Common: Landscape Change and Perceptions of Wildlife
Abstract
Some wildlife species are adapting to urbanizing settings made more attractive due to changes in land-use practices, human attitudes and behaviors, and conservation efforts. People who live in communities near suburban parks are encountering wildlife more frequently than in the past, with varying reactions. In-depth interviews conducted with residents living near three national parks yielded insight on “suburban deer” as an emerging social construct. Interviewees described expectations about deer abundance and behavior that guided their interactions with suburban deer and affected deer behavior, which in turn affected interviewees’ evaluations of deer and subsequent responses to interactions. Left unchecked, this process may result in the ultimate “tragedy of becoming common,” when species are no longer viewed as wildlife, but as pests or pets. In the absence of an established cultural construct for suburban wildlife, stakeholder engagement will continue to play an important role in understanding and addressing these diverging views.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rare species are generally considered to have greater value than abundant species.
“For example, rare species are generally considered to have greater value than abundant species (Leong, 2009), which often results in greater tolerance, positive attitudes, and conservation support from the public (e.g., Kontsiotis et al., 2021).”
From Of Rarity and Symbolism: Understanding Human Perceptions of Charismatic Color Morphs (2024) · cites this paper as Leong, 2009
Rareness may result in greater tolerance, positive attitudes, and conservation support from the public.
“For example, rare species are generally considered to have greater value than abundant species (Leong, 2009), which often results in greater tolerance, positive attitudes, and conservation support from the public (e.g., Kontsiotis et al., 2021).”
From Of Rarity and Symbolism: Understanding Human Perceptions of Charismatic Color Morphs (2024) · cites this paper as Leong, 2009
Species once considered a valuable resource, such as Canada geese and white-tailed deer, have been redefined as pests as their numbers and interactions with humans have increased.
“For instance, species once considered a valuable resource, such as Canada geese (Branta canadensis) and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), have been redefined as pests as their numbers and interactions with humans have increased (Zinn et al., 2000;Leong, 2009).”
From Of Rarity and Symbolism: Understanding Human Perceptions of Charismatic Color Morphs (2024) · cites this paper as Leong, 2009
Especially in urban and suburban areas, wildlife that become habituated to people may be increasingly seen as pests, losing their wildness.
“Especially in urban and suburban areas, wildlife that become habituated to people may be increasingly seen as pests, losing their “wildness” (Leong, 2009).”
From Of Rarity and Symbolism: Understanding Human Perceptions of Charismatic Color Morphs (2024) · cites this paper as Leong, 2009
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,636 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Qualitative research examines “things in their natural settings, attempting to make sense of, or interpret, phenomena in terms of the meanings people bring to them” (Denzin and Lincoln 2000 , 3).”
BackgroundGrounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/bf00988593 · Cited by 11,133 · see citing works
Rarity Value and Species Extinction: The Anthropogenic Allee Effect
Courchamp, F., Angulo, E., Rivalan, P., Hall, R. J., Signoret, L., Bull, L., & Meinard, Y. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040415 · Cited by 650 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Nash (2001) argued that relative scarcity helped wilderness gain value, and a recent study shows that this type of valuation also applies to wildlife species (Courchamp et al. 2006).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rearticulating the myth of human–wildlife conflict
Peterson, M. N., Birckhead, J. L., Leong, K. M., Peterson, M. J., & Peterson, T. (2010) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1755-263x.2010.00099.x · Cited by 453 · see citing works
“…simultaneously conserving biodiversity appear incompatible (Kerr & Currie 1995; Forester & Machlis 1996; Czech et al. 2000), but little research addresses how social constructions of those material conditions shape biodiversity conservation (Herda-Rapp & Goedeke 2005; Chan et al. 2007; Leong 2010).”
BackgroundSelf-citationHunting for fear: innovating management of human–wildlife conflicts
Cromsigt, J., Kuijper, D., Adam, M., Beschta, R., Churski, M., Eycott, A., Kerley, G., Mysterud, A., Schmidt, K., & West, K. (2013) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12076 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
“Some suggested hunting methods are even illegal, such as the use of dogs in hunting ungulates in several European countries (Apollonio, Andersen & Putman 2010) or killing of elephant cows and calves in breeding herds in South Africa (Scholes & Mennell 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialLischka, S. A., Teel, T. L., Johnson, H. E., Reed, S., Breck, S., Carlos, A. W. D., & Crooks, K. (2018) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2018.06.020 · Cited by 165
“The need for social-ecological integration is readily apparent in the management of human-wildlife interactions (HWIs), defined as the spatial and temporal juxtaposition of human and wildlife activities where humans, wildlife, or both are affected (Leong, 2010; Peterson et al., 2010).”
BackgroundHermann, N., Voss, C., & Menzel, S. (2013) · Journal for Nature Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2012.11.008 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Conflict Is Integral to Human-Wildlife Coexistence
Hill, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Conservation Science · doi:10.3389/fcosc.2021.734314 · Cited by 83
“…are exacerbated, this can be a result of changes in local human-wildlife relations, including changing wildlife population distribution and density (Leong, 2009), changes in human and/or animal behavior (Naughton-Treves et al., 2017), and even institutional and policy changes that create social…”
BackgroundMorzillo, A., de Beurs, K. D., & Martin-Mikle, C. J. (2014) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-06883-190344 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“Thus, human decisions about landscape characteristics can result in attracting wildlife, and be iterative if humans reinforce those characteristics following wildlife-related events (Leong 2009).”
BackgroundPublic attitudes towards “pest” management: Perceptions on squirrel management strategies in the UK
Dunn, M., Marzano, M., Forster, J., & Gill, R. (2018) · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.020 · Cited by 65
“For example, perceptions of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), black bear (Ursus americanus), beaver (Castor canadensis), and Canada geese (Branta canadensis) have all been observed to morph as their populations and the subsequent frequency of interactions with humans have changed (Leong, 2009).”
BackgroundAbrams, K. M., Leong, K. M., Melena, S., & Teel, T. L. (2019) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2019.1649291 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“In turn, people may treat the animals as tame without exercising appropriate caution (Leong, 2009).”
InfluentialSelf-citationMammals in and around suburban yards, and the attraction of chicken coops
Kays, R., & Parsons, A. (2014) · Urban Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s11252-014-0347-2 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“Thus, our study indicates that deer in the Raleigh area seem less abundant and/or habituated than some other eastern North American communities, where they can be pests in backyard gardens (Decker and Gavin 1987; Nielsen et al. 1997; Leong 2009).”
BackgroundWildlife in U.S. Cities: Managing Unwanted Animals
Hadidian, J. (2015) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani5040401 · Cited by 42
Torrents‐Ticó, M., Fernández‐Llamazares, Á., Burgas, D., & Cabeza, M. (2021) · AMBIO · doi:10.1007/s13280-020-01443-4 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“The literature has to date interchangeably used the terms ‘‘knowledge’’ (e.g., Anadón et al. 2009; Kamgaing et al. 2019) and ‘‘perception’’ (e.g., Leong 2009) to refer to local reports of species abundances and trends.”
MethodREVIEW: Ecological feedbacks can reduce population‐level efficacy of wildlife fertility control
Ransom, J., Powers, J., Hobbs, N., & Baker, D. (2013) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12166 · Cited by 36
“their role as a natural resource and more on how they are part of our social environment (Leong 2010).”
BackgroundZorondo-Rodríguez, F., Reyes-García, V., & Simonetti, J. A. (2014) · Revista Chilena de Historia Natural · doi:10.1186/0717-6317-87-4 · Cited by 34
“Both negative and positive interactions between wildlife and humans can spring up in lands where threatened species overlap with human settlements (Raymond and Olive 2008; Wallace et al. 2008; Leong 2010).”
BackgroundShifts in Attitudes Toward Coyotes on the Urbanized East Coast: The Cape Cod Experience, 2005–2012
Jackman, J. S., & Rutberg, A. (2015) · Human Dimensions of Wildlife · doi:10.1080/10871209.2015.1027973 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“…may persist even in the face of conflicts (Krester, Curtis, Francis, Pendall, & Knuth, 2009), although species risk the “tragedy of becoming common” in which they come to be viewed as nuisance animals rather than wildlife (DeStefano & Deblinger, 2005; DeStefano & DeGraaf, 2003; Leong, 2009).”
BackgroundResponse-ability in wolf–dog conflicts
Peltola, T., & Heikkilä, J. (2015) · Zeitschrift f\ ur Jagdwissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s10344-015-0946-0 · Cited by 27
Fraser-Celin, V.-L., Hovorka, A., & Silver, J. J. (2018) · Human Dimensions of Wildlife · doi:10.1080/10871209.2018.1443528 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“Different social constructions of animals reveal points of contention and (dis)agreements over their use, where they belong (e.g., in national parks, homes, zoos), and management goals and practices (Goedeke, 2005; Leong, 2008).”
BackgroundUnderstanding conflicting cultural models of outdoor cats to overcome conservation impasse
Leong, K. M., Gramza, A. R., & Lepczyk, C. (2020) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.13530 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“For example, how people understand an animal is based as much on the meanings they impose as it is on empirical reality (Leong 2009; DeMello 2012; Frank et al. 2019).”
BackgroundSelf-citationKontsiotis, V. J., Triantafyllidis, A., Telidis, S., Eleftheriadou, I., & Liordos, V. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132011335 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“In addition, people place higher values on species when they are rare and a lower value on species perceived as common [45].”
BackgroundBeliefs about Ecological Impacts Predict Deer Acceptance Capacity and Hunting Support
Johnson, B., & Horowitz, L. (2014) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.905887 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“Leong (2010) found people described deer as ‘‘overabundant’’ when they had experienced negative impacts, but also when they were concerned about negative impacts for deer and believed ‘‘unnatural’’ conditions needed correction.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialCurtis, P. (2020) · doi:10.26077/k7ye-k912 · Cited by 18
Conflict and consensus in stakeholder views of seal management on Nantucket Island, MA, USA
Jackman, J. S., Bettencourt, L., Vaske, J., Sweeney, M., Bloom, K., Rutberg, A., & Brook, B. (2018) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2018.03.006 · Cited by 17
Bases of Support Differ for Deer Reduction Versus Behavior Change Options to Manage Deer Impacts
Johnson, B. (2014) · doi:10.1080/10871209.2013.819596 · Cited by 15
“General attitudes about the environment or wildlife in general also affected support (e.g., Lauber, Knuth, Tantillo, & Curtis, 2007; Leong, 2010; Manfredo, Teel, & Bright, 2003; Skogen & Thrane, 2008; Zinn, Manfredo, & Vaske, 2000).”
BackgroundManagers’ Perceptions of Illegal Marijuana Cultivation on U.S. Federal Lands
Rose, J., Brownlee, M., & Bricker, K. (2016) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2015.1062948 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“While Hardin’s metaphor has been widely embraced as a way of understanding various natural resource management strategies (cf. Brown and Harris 1992; Honey-Roses 2009; Leong 2009; Pandit and Thapa 2004), it has also been the subject of debate and critique.”
BackgroundMcCann, N. P., Walberg, E. M., Forester, J., Schrage, M., Fulton, D., & Ditmer, M. A. (2021) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.14021 · Cited by 12
Dinat, D., Echeverri, A., Chapman, M., Karp, D., & Satterfield, T. (2019) · Human Dimensions of Wildlife · doi:10.1080/10871209.2019.1614239 · Cited by 11
“Less attention has been given to species that are viewed negatively (but see Douglas & Veríssimo, 2013; Leong, 2009).”
BackgroundA Framework for Assessing and Quantifying Human–Wildlife Interactions in Urban Areas
Soulsbury, C., & White, P. C. L. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108235730 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Of Rarity and Symbolism: Understanding Human Perceptions of Charismatic Color Morphs
Williams, T. D., Kreling, S. E. S., Stanton, L. A., Wilkinson, C. E., Estien, C. O., Schell, C. J., & Carlen, E. J. (2024) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10745-024-00492-7 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“For instance, species once considered a valuable resource, such as Canada geese ( Branta canadensis ) and white-tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus ), have been redefined as pests as their numbers and interactions with humans have increased (Zinn et al., 2000; Leong, 2009).”
InfluentialA Framework for Assessing and Quantifying Human–Wildlife Interactions in Urban Areas
Soulsbury, C., & White, P. C. L. (2019) · Human-Wildlife Interactions · doi:10.1017/9781108235730.009 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Urban Wildlife Science in Coupled Human–Natural Systems
Strohbach, M., Warren, P., & Peterson, M. N. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7500-3_3 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Stinchcomb, T. R., Ma, Z., Swihart, R. K., Caudell, J., Nyssa, Z., & Sponarski, C. (2024) · Conservation Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/csp2.13086 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“…and emotional costs, conflicting management objectives, social identities, and political processes (e.g., Epstein & Haggerty, 2022; Haggerty et al., 2018; Hill, 2015; Knackmuhs et al., 2019; Leong, 2009; Leong et al., 2007; Peterson et al., 2013; Vernon & Clark, 2016; Zimmermann et al., 2020).”
BackgroundPeltola, T., Heikkilä, J., & Vepsäläinen, M. (2013) · doi:10.1080/01426397.2013.773298 · Cited by 7
“Thus, human–wildlife conflicts are often conflicts not only between humans and animals but also between groups of humans (Leong, 2009).”
BackgroundPerspectives of New York State residents on deer management, hunting, and predator reintroduction
Blossey, B., Brice, E. M., Dalaba, J. R., & Hare, D. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-90600-4 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Crowding, Public Image, and Bureaucracy: Issues in the Montana Outfitting Industry
Eliason, S. (2012) · Journal of Rural and Community Development · doi:10.63315/27ebxw67 · Cited by 6
“To explore issues in the outfitting industry, this study was guided by a symbolic interaction theoretical perspective (Capek, 2006; Granfield et al., 2005; Lawson, Lawson, & Leck, 2005; Leong, 2010; Scarce, 1998; Shaffir & Pawluch, 2003).”
MethodUnderstanding perceptions that drive conflict over the endangered Hawaiian monk seal
Konrad, L., Levine, A., Leong, K. M., & Koethe, F. (2024) · Frontiers in Conservation Science · doi:10.3389/fcosc.2024.1394063 · Cited by 4
Self-citationThe gulf between men and monkeys
Radhakrishna, S. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3967-7_1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Waterman, J., Black, S., Sykes, N., Mills, W., Doherty, S., Britton, H., Smallman, R., Sheridan, A., Kitchener, A. C., & Fellowes, M. D. E. (2025) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2024.106147 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Perceptions of wildlife in rehabilitation from images and statements
Buckanoff, H., & Williams, K. (2024) · Frontiers in Human Dynamics · doi:10.3389/fhumd.2024.1216121 · Cited by 2
Faull, J., Griffin, L. L., Nolan, G., Haigh, A., David, A., Redmond, S., Collins, N., Mcdonnell, P., Kane, A., & Ciuti, S. (2026) · People and Nature · doi:10.1002/pan3.70222 · Cited by 1
“This can result in increased human–wildlife interactions, leading to both becoming habituated to each other and ultimately humans stop seeing these animals as ‘wild’ (Leong, 2010 ).”
Nature, Causes, and Impact of Human–Wildlife Interactions on Women and Children Across Cultures
Halder, S., Ruiz‐Casares, M., Yamaguchi, S., Dhali, H. H., Mukherjee, R., Calderón-Moya, M., Mandal, A., Rankin, S., Guzder, J., & Ghosh, R. (2025) · World · doi:10.3390/world6020055 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Soto, S., & Cerda, C. (2019) · Luna Azul · doi:10.17151/luaz.2019.48.8 · Cited by 1
THE ROLE OF COGNITIVE SCRIPTS IN THE ORGANIZATION OF CAMPUS TOURS
Chiang, W.-W., Tu, F., & Liu, C.-J. (2014) · Journal of Baltic Science Education · doi:10.33225/jbse/14.13.33 · Cited by 1
“Visitors prefer animals to plants by the results (Fischer et al., 2011; Herzog & Burghardt, 1988; Leong, 2010).”
BackgroundReconstructing Dead Nonhuman Animals: Motivations for Becoming a Taxidermist
Eliason, S. (2012) · doi:10.1163/156853012x614332 · Cited by 1
“…2011; Knight, 2009; Montag, Patterson, & Freimund, 2005); the meaning of animals in contemporary society and how they are socially constructed (Leong, 2010; Jerolmack, 2008; Herda-Rapp & Goedeke, 2005; Lawson, Lawson, & Leck, 2005; Palmer & Forsyth, 1992), and the meaning and display of…”
BackgroundAttitudes toward reactive and proactive wildlife management across Europe.
Villafuerte-Jordán, R., Delibes-Mateos, M., Glikman, J., Sandström, C., Widemo, F., & Martínez-Jauregui, M. (2026) · Ambio · doi:10.1007/s13280-026-02455-2
“In Europe, wildlife is increasingly coming into contact with humans, driven by human population growth and the rising abundance of certain wildlife species, primarily as a result of land use changes and the implementation of conservation policies (Leong 2009).”
Luna, A., & McFadden, T. (2026) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111667
Miller, B. T., Grubbs, B. R., & Neely, B. C. (2024) · Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science · doi:10.1660/062.127.0302
Ecological Discomforts and How to Study Them
Tokarski, M. (2019) · The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-18971-6_2
- Authors
- Leong, K. M.
- Affiliations
- National Park Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Leong, Kirsten M.
- ORCID
- Leong, Kirsten M.
- Venue
- Society & Natural Resources
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-12-31
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 111-127
- ISSN
- 0894-1920 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0723
- OpenAlex
- W1999838771
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Society & Natural Resources (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographies of human-animal interactions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Animal and Plant Science Education
- Keywords
- human-wildlife interactions, tragedy of the commons, wildlife perception, national parks, suburbanization, landscape change, land use change, attitudes toward wildlife, stakeholder engagement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review