The Predictive Ability of Wildlife Value Orientations for Mammal Management Varies with Species Conservation Status and Provenance
Open accessAbstract
Wildlife value orientations (WVOs) can predict consensus or controversy over wildlife-related issues and are therefore important for their successful management. We carried out on-site face-to-face interviews with Greek people (n = 2392) to study two basic WVOs, i.e., domination (prioritize human well-being over wildlife) and mutualism (wildlife has rights just as humans). Our sample was more mutualism-oriented than domination-oriented; however, domination was a better predictor of management acceptability than mutualism. WVOs were better predictors of the acceptability of lethal strategies (shooting, destruction at breeding sites, 11–36% of variance explained) relative to taking no action (9–18%) and non-lethal strategies (e.g., compensation, fencing, trapping, and relocating, 0–13%). In addition, the predictive ability of WVOs, mostly for accepting lethal strategies, increased with the increasing severity of the conflict (crop damage, attacking domestic animals, 11–29%; disease transmission, 17–36%) and depending on species conservation status and provenance (endangered native brown bear (Ursus arctos), 11–20%; common native red fox (Vulpes vulpes), 12–31%; common exotic coypu (Myocastor coypus), 17–36%). Managers should consider these findings for developing education and outreach programs, especially when they intend to raise support for lethal strategies. In doing so, they would be able to subsequently implement effective wildlife management plans.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rare species are generally considered to have greater value than abundant species.
“For example, rare species are generally considered to have greater value than abundant species (Leong, 2009), which often results in greater tolerance, positive attitudes, and conservation support from the public (e.g., Kontsiotis et al., 2021).”
From Of Rarity and Symbolism: Understanding Human Perceptions of Charismatic Color Morphs (2024) · cites this paper as Kontsiotis et al., 2021
Section 4.1 (page unavailable) says the public viewed the rare brown bear as attractive and worthy of protection, and gave it first priority for conservation and respect for life over the common species studied. This supports the conservation-support and tolerance aspects of the clause cited to Kontsiotis et al., but the paper does not establish that rarity or greater perceived value causes greater tolerance and positive attitudes generally; the species also differ in charisma and provenance. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredRareness may result in greater tolerance, positive attitudes, and conservation support from the public.
“For example, rare species are generally considered to have greater value than abundant species (Leong, 2009), which often results in greater tolerance, positive attitudes, and conservation support from the public (e.g., Kontsiotis et al., 2021).”
From Of Rarity and Symbolism: Understanding Human Perceptions of Charismatic Color Morphs (2024) · cites this paper as Kontsiotis et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Gouldner, H. P., & Rokeach, M. (1975) · doi:10.2307/2062614 · Cited by 12,134 · cited 6×
“WVOs resolve internal collisions by prioritizing certain values over other values in the context of wildlife [5].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialReporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.3200/joer.99.6.323-338 · Cited by 6,937 · see citing works
Issg (2000) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520948433-159 · Cited by 2,508 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For these reasons, coypu is on the list of the 100 World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species [20].”
BackgroundA Theory of Cultural Value Orientations: Explication and Applications
Schwartz, S. (2006) · Comparative Sociology · doi:10.1163/156913306778667357 · Cited by 2,150 · cited 2× · see citing works
“An individual holds various values [36], and one’s behavior is most often guided by more than one value [5].”
BackgroundA structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy.
Homer, P., & Kahle, L. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.638 · Cited by 2,041 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Our results suggest, in agreement with theoretical predictions [1,4,5,41] and previous research [6–8], that people with a domination orientation were more likely to accept strategies that imply harm to animals than people with a mutualism orientation.”
ResultWildlife value orientations: A conceptual and measurement approach
Fulton, D., Manfredo, M., & Lipscomb, J. (1996) · Human Dimensions of Wildlife · doi:10.1080/10871209609359060 · Cited by 779 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[3] developed a measurement instrument for basic beliefs concerning human–wildlife interactions based on the concept of value orientation.”
BackgroundCo-Managing Human–Wildlife Conflicts: A Review
Treves, A., Wallace, R., Naughton-Treves, L., & Morales, A. (2006) · Human Dimensions of Wildlife · doi:10.1080/10871200600984265 · Cited by 606 · see citing works
Thomas, C., & Benjamin, B. (2021) · Demographic Analysis · doi:10.2307/2343575 · Cited by 530
Understanding the Diversity of Public Interests in Wildlife Conservation
Teel, T. L., & Manfredo, M. (2010) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01374.x · Cited by 417 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Value orientations are networks of basic beliefs organized around values and provide contextual meaning to those values in relation to a particular domain, such as wildlife [1,2].”
BackgroundManfredo, M., Teel, T. L., & Henry, K. L. (2009) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00624.x · Cited by 347 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Our results suggest, in agreement with theoretical predictions [1,4,5,41] and previous research [6–8], that people with a domination orientation were more likely to accept strategies that imply harm to animals than people with a mutualism orientation.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialKnight, A. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.001 · Cited by 334 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The level of endangerment of a species is an important predictor of the support for wildlife conservation [37,38,43,44].”
BackgroundFactors influencing public preferences for invasive alien species management
Sharp, R., Larson, L. R., & Green, G. T. (2011) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.04.032 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
The eradication of muskrats and coypus from Britain
Gosling, L., & Baker, S. (1989) · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1989.tb01561.x · Cited by 178
Social and Cognitive Correlates of Utah Residents' Acceptance of the Lethal Control of Wolves
Bruskotter, J., Vaske, J., & Schmidt, R. H. (2009) · Human Dimensions of Wildlife · doi:10.1080/10871200802712571 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Predictive potential of wildlife value orientations for acceptability of management interventions
Jacobs, M., Vaske, J., & Sijtsma, M. (2014) · Journal for Nature Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2014.03.005 · Cited by 115 · cited 7× · see citing works
“[7] suggested that mutualism might better predict support for the conservation of rare species, while domination might better explain support for the control of common species in common situations.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialEffects of attitudes and demography on public support for endangered species conservation.
Liordos, V., Kontsiotis, V. J., Anastasiadou, M., & Karavasias, E. (2017) · Science of the Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.241 · Cited by 110 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The level of endangerment of a species is an important predictor of the support for wildlife conservation [37,38,43,44].”
BackgroundSelf-citationPanzacchi, M., Cocchi, R., Genovesi, P., & Bertolino, S. (2007) · Wildlife Biology · doi:10.2981/0909-6396(2007)13[159:pcocmc]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 102 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Their high reproductive rates and their habit to consume whole plants, including roots, allows for their rapid population increase and spatial expansion and has severe impacts, predominantly damage to crops and disease transmission [18,19].”
BackgroundHermann, N., Voss, C., & Menzel, S. (2013) · Journal for Nature Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2012.11.008 · Cited by 101 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[42] reported that mutualism was a better predictor of a conservation intervention, supporting the return of the endangered grey wolf (Canis lupus) and European bison (Bison bonasus) in Germany.”
BackgroundJacobs, M., Vaske, J., Teel, T. L., & Manfredo, M. (2018) · Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1002/9781119241072.ch9 · Cited by 78 · cited 1×
“However, as WVOs are relatively stable [1,5,52] and the internal conflict of values is intense in lethal strategies, managers should keep in mind that communication and outreach plans are less likely to be successful for lethal than for non-lethal strategies [7].”
BackgroundPublic acceptance of management methods under different human-wildlife conflict scenarios.
Liordos, V., Kontsiotis, V. J., Georgari, M., Baltzi, K., & Baltzi, I. (2017) · Science of the Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.040 · Cited by 77 · cited 1×
“Previous research has shown that lethal strategies were more acceptable and controversial for managing coypus than native pest species [28].”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Effects of Information on Willingness-to-Pay Values of Endangered Species
Tkac, J. (1998) · doi:10.2307/1244227 · Cited by 74 · cited 1×
“The level of endangerment of a species is an important predictor of the support for wildlife conservation [37,38,43,44].”
BackgroundEvidence of a large carnivore population recovery: Counting bears in Greece
Karamanlidis, A., Hernando, M. D. G., Krambokoukis, L., & Gimenez, O. (2015) · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2015.06.002 · Cited by 70 · cited 1×
“The two main brown bear populations are on the Pindos mountain range, the backbone of mainland Greece, running north to south from Albania to central Greece (estimated at about 300–350 individuals), and on the Rhodope mountain range in Northeast Greece (estimated at about 70–100 individuals), with the total Greek popu…”
BackgroundAcceptability of Lethal Control of Wildlife that Damage Agriculture in the Netherlands
Sijtsma, M., Vaske, J., & Jacobs, M. (2012) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2012.684850 · Cited by 60 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[6] found that WVOs were the best predictors of the acceptability of lethal control to minimize the impacts of geese and deer on agricultural crops in the Netherlands.”
BackgroundFears, attitudes and opinions of suburban residents with regards to their urban foxes
König, A. (2008) · Zeitschrift f\ ur Jagdwissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s10344-007-0117-z · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Structural and economic aspects of human–bear conflicts in Greece
Karamanlidis, A., Sanopoulos, A., Georgiadis, L., & Zedrosser, A. (2011) · doi:10.2192/ursus-d-10-00016.1 · Cited by 59 · cited 3×
“They, mostly farmers, resort to fencing for protecting their property from brown bears and red foxes, demanding compensation when damage occurs [11,32].”
BackgroundFrank, B., Monaco, A., & Bath, A. (2015) · Zeitschrift f\ ur Jagdwissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s10344-015-0948-y · Cited by 55 · cited 1×
“They, mostly farmers, resort to fencing for protecting their property from brown bears and red foxes, demanding compensation when damage occurs [11,32].”
BackgroundThe Tragedy of Becoming Common: Landscape Change and Perceptions of Wildlife
Leong, K. M. (2009) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920802438642 · Cited by 51 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In addition, people place higher values on species when they are rare and a lower value on species perceived as common [45].”
BackgroundSemiaquatic mammals introduced into Italy: case studies in biological invasion
Bertolino, S., & Genovesi, P. (2007) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6029-8_9 · Cited by 46 · cited 1×
“Coypus (Myocastor coypus) are large semi-aquatic rodents native to southern South America [15], which have been introduced for fur farming into Europe, Asia, Africa, and North America [16,17].”
BackgroundThe two faces of Janus, or the dual mode of public attitudes towards snakes.
Liordos, V., Kontsiotis, V. J., Kokoris, S., & Pimenidou, M. (2018) · Science of the Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.311 · Cited by 43 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The level of endangerment of a species is an important predictor of the support for wildlife conservation [37,38,43,44].”
BackgroundSelf-citationDifferences in Management Action Acceptability for Coyotes in a National Park
Sponarski, C., Vaske, J., & Bath, A. (2015) · doi:10.1002/wsb.535 · Cited by 38
Manfredo, M. J. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-77040-6_1 · Cited by 36 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Our results suggest, in agreement with theoretical predictions [1,4,5,41] and previous research [6–8], that people with a domination orientation were more likely to accept strategies that imply harm to animals than people with a mutualism orientation.”
ResultEffects of managed impoundments and herbivory on wetland plant production and stand structure
Randall, L. A. J., & Foote, A. (2005) · Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.) · doi:10.1672/0277-5212(2005)025[0038:eomiah]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 35 · cited 1×
“Their high reproductive rates and their habit to consume whole plants, including roots, allows for their rapid population increase and spatial expansion and has severe impacts, predominantly damage to crops and disease transmission [18,19].”
BackgroundFood habits of the red fox in Greece
Papageorgiou, N. K., Sepougaris, A., Christopoulou, O. G., Vlachos, C. G., & Petamidis, J. S. (1988) · Acta Theriologica · doi:10.4098/at.arch.88-25 · Cited by 30 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[12] found goat kids, lambs, calves, and piglets in red fox diet.”
BackgroundTsiodras, S., Dougas, G., Baka, A., Billinis, C., Doudounakis, S., Balaska, A., Georgakopoulou, T., Rigakos, G., Kontos, V., Tasioudi, K., et al. (2013) · Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · doi:10.2807/ese.18.18.20474-en · Cited by 29
Heneghan, M., & Morse, W. (2019) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2018.1556756 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Acceptability and consensus for the management of game and non-game crop raiders
Kontsiotis, V. J., Vadikolios, G., & Liordos, V. (2020) · Wildlife research (East Melbourne) · doi:10.1071/wr19083 · Cited by 23
Self-citationWildlife value orientations and their relationships with mid-size predator management
Glas, Z. E., Getson, J., & Prokopy, L. (2019) · Human Dimensions of Wildlife · doi:10.1080/10871209.2019.1622820 · Cited by 23 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Glas et al [8] evaluated the predictive ability of WVOs for six meso-predator species (striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis), coyotes (Canis latrans), common raccoons (Procyon lotor), red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), American badgers (Taxidea taxus), river otters (Lontra canadensis)) in Indiana, USA, across conflict situations…”
BackgroundStraka, T., Kendal, D., & van der Ree, R. (2016) · Human Dimensions of Wildlife · doi:10.1080/10871209.2016.1198851 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Recurrence of Animal Rabies, Greece, 2012
Tasioudi, K., Iliadou, P., Agianniotaki, E. I., Robardet, E., Liandris, E., Doudounakis, S., Tzani, M., Tsaroucha, P., Picard-Meyer, E., Cliquet, F., et al. (2014) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid2002.130473 · Cited by 22
Understanding stakeholder preferences for managing red foxes in different situations
Liordos, V., Kontsiotis, V. J., & Emmanouilidou, F. (2020) · Ecological Processes · doi:10.1186/s13717-020-00224-x · Cited by 16 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In contrast, farmers actively pursuit and illegally kill coypus when they find them on their land, fearing losing their crops [30].”
BackgroundSelf-citationLiordos, V., Kontsiotis, V. J., Nevolianis, C., & Nikolopoulou, C. (2019) · Human Dimensions of Wildlife · doi:10.1080/10871209.2019.1622821 · Cited by 16
Self-citationWildlife Value Orientations and Demographics in Greece
Liordos, V., Kontsiotis, V. J., Eleftheriadou, I., Telidis, S., & Triantafyllidis, A. (2021) · Earth · doi:10.3390/earth2030027 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
10 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Carter, J.; Leonard, B.P. A review of the literature on the worldwide distribution, spread of, and efforts to eradicate the coypu (Myocastor coypus). Wildl. Soc. Bull. 2002, 30, 162-175. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Redpath, S.M.; Bhatia, S.; Young, J. Tilting at wildlife: Reconsidering human-wildlife conflict. Oryx 2015, 49, 222-225. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1978.
- Wilson, D.E.; Lacher, T.E.; Mittermeier, R.A. (Eds.) Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 6. Lagomorphs and Rodents I; Lynx Edicions: Barcelona, Spain, 2008.
- Bright, A.D.; Manfredo, M.J.; Fulton, D.C. Segmenting the public: An application of value orientations to wildlife planning in Colorado. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 2000, 28, 218-226. [CrossRef] · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Economic Valuation of Balkan Chamois Conservation
Liordos, V., Antoniadou, M., & Kontsiotis, V. J. (2023) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani13040691 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationOf Rarity and Symbolism: Understanding Human Perceptions of Charismatic Color Morphs
Williams, T. D., Kreling, S. E. S., Stanton, L. A., Wilkinson, C. E., Estien, C. O., Schell, C. J., & Carlen, E. J. (2024) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10745-024-00492-7 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“For example, rare species are generally considered to have greater value than abundant species (Leong, 2009), which often results in greater tolerance, positive attitudes, and conservation support from the public (e.g., Kontsiotis et al., 2021).”
Economic Valuation of Northern White-Breasted Hedgehog Conservation
Kontsiotis, V. J., Chrysopoulou, D., Chrysopoulou, P., & Liordos, V. (2023) · Diversity · doi:10.3390/d15040490 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Wildlife value orientations have proved important predictors of public attitudes and behaviors toward wildlife, with those who are more mutualist being more positive toward and supportive of wildlife conservation than those who are more dominionistic [19,43,45–47].”
BackgroundSelf-citationEriksson, L., Johansson, M., Månsson, J., Sandström, C., Liljebäck, N., & Elmberg, J. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-80661-2 · Cited by 8
“Our data contradict that WVOs would be more predictive of acceptance of measures that are more harmful to wildlife 38 but support the position of Jacobs et al. 20 that WVOs are particularly important when there is a value conflict given the focus on tools that are more extreme at either side of the…”
Economic valuation of snake conservation in Greece
Liordos, V., Rapti, A., & Kontsiotis, V. J. (2024) · Journal for Nature Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126615 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationRelationships between wildlife value orientations and social identity
Liordos, V., Kontsiotis, V. J., Telidis, S., Eleftheriadou, I., & Triantafyllidis, A. (2023) · Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration · doi:10.1007/s41207-023-00393-z · Cited by 7
Self-citationLucas, P. U., Lund, T. B., & Gamborg, C. (2023) · Energy, Sustainability and Society · doi:10.1186/s13705-023-00427-y · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Cardoso, C., Sargo, R., Sousa, L., Silva, F., & Pires, I. (2026) · Birds · doi:10.3390/birds7020028 · Cited by 1
“Model performance was evaluated using the omnibus likelihood ratio test, Nagelkerke’s R 2 , overall classification accuracy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) [18,19].”
Paquingan, I. R. B. E., de Vera, P. J. D., Catipay, J. P. A., Kontsiotis, V. J., & Liordos, V. (2025) · Environments · doi:10.3390/environments12120467 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationAttitudes Toward Managing a Fish-Eating Predator, the Great Cormorant, in a Coastal Environment
Liordos, V., Kontsiotis, V. J., Karras, G., Kyriakidou, C., & Karris, G. (2025) · Diversity · doi:10.3390/d17050306 · Cited by 1
Self-citationDominant attitudes and values toward wildlife and the environment in coastal A labama
Hertel, S. W., Stupavsky, J., Alford, K., Hicks, H., Heaton, A., Katlein, N., Hastings, B. T., Stern, A., Jett, S., Wang, A. Y., et al. (2023) · Conservation Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/csp2.12957 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Experience beats confidence: a WVO-segmented model of flying fox conservation behaviour
Shao, B.-W., Pang, B., Harris, J. A., & Foote, L. (2026) · Journal of Social Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsocm-09-2025-0275
Attitudes toward reactive and proactive wildlife management across Europe.
Villafuerte-Jordán, R., Delibes-Mateos, M., Glikman, J., Sandström, C., Widemo, F., & Martínez-Jauregui, M. (2026) · Ambio · doi:10.1007/s13280-026-02455-2
“Respondents’ attitudes toward wildlife management, which were measured using 10 items based on previous literature (Jacobs et al. 2014; Kontsiotis et al. 2021).”
Attitudes toward a flagship caprid, the endangered Cretan agrimi
Liordos, V., Aggelioudakis, G., & Kontsiotis, V. J. (2026) · Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration · doi:10.1007/s41207-026-01258-x
“Utilization-related domination wildlife value orientations have been linked to lower support for austere conservation strategies (Teel and Manfredo 2010; Gigliotti and Sweikert 2019; Kontsiotis et al. 2021).”
Self-citationPerceptions of moose health and support for hunting as a management strategy against parasitism
Horne, L., DiMatteo-LePape, A., Woods, A., Salcido, E., Urioste-Stone, S. D. D., Daigle, J., Morano, S., & Kantar, L. (2025) · Human Dimensions of Wildlife · doi:10.1080/10871209.2025.2589868
“Studies show that wildlife values orientation and attitudes have predicted support for general wildlife management actions in many contexts and can be strong predictors of support for lethal wildlife management actions (Kontsiotis et al., 2021; Sijtsma et al., 2012; Whittaker et al., 2006).”
Mus, M., Hadjes, A., Mercier, H., & Chevallier, C. (2025) · Journal for Nature Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126910
- Authors
- Kontsiotis, V. J., Triantafyllidis, A., Telidis, S., Eleftheriadou, I., & Liordos, V.
- Affiliations
- International Hellenic University (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Liordos, Vasilios
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-10-14
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 11335
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3205431815
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Animal and Plant Science Education
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
- Keywords
- wildlife value orientations, human-wildlife conflict, species status, native vs exotic species, brown bear, red fox, Myocastor coypus, crop damage, disease transmission, public attitudes toward wildlife, Greece
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review