The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Changing forest values and ecosystem management
Abstract
There is substantial evidence that we are currently in a period of rapid and significant change in forest values. Some have charged that managing forests in ways that are responsive to diverse and changing forest values is the main challenge faced by public forest managers. To tackle this challenge, we need to address the following questions: (1) What is the nature of forest values? That is, can all forest values be reduced to a single dimension, as assumed in utilitarian‐based traditional forestry and economics, or are these values multidimensional and incommensurate? (2) What specific values are involved? (3) What is the structure of forest values? That is, how are they related to each other in value systems? (4) How and why have forest values changed over time? and (5) What do changing forest values imply for ecosystem management approaches? This article discusses key issues related to these questions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2010) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/(issn)1540-6237 · Cited by 13,458
(1973) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,144
The “new environmental paradigm”
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875 · Cited by 2,833
Variations in Value Orientations.
Rosenberg, M., Kluckhohn, F. R., Strodtbeck, F. L., Roberts, J. M., Romney, A. K., Kluckhohn, C., & Scarr, H. A. (1961) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2090580 · Cited by 2,816
Daly, H. E., Cobb, J. B., & Cobb, C. W. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,649
Ecological economics: the science and management of sustainability
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3406 · Cited by 1,612
Beliefs, Attitudes and Values: A Theory of Organization and Change
Fichter, J. H., & Rokeach, M. (1972) · Review of Religious Research · doi:10.2307/3509738 · Cited by 1,386
Beliefs, Attitudes and Values: A Theory of Organization and Change
Eckardt, A. R., & Rokeach, M. (1970) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1384840 · Cited by 1,007
Ecosystem health: new goals for environmental management
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5548 · Cited by 911
Discordant harmonies: a new ecology for the twenty-first century
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-2102 · Cited by 867
Cited by
Adamowicz, W., Beckley, T., Macdonald, D. H., Just, L., Luckert, M., Murray, E., & Phillips, W. (1998) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941929809381061 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Bengston, D. N.
- Venue
- Society & Natural Resources
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 515-533
- ISSN
- 0894-1920 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0723
- OpenAlex
- W1994043236
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 9.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changing forest values and ecosystem management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08941929409380885
- The paper
- Bengston, D. N. (1994). Changing forest values and ecosystem management. Society & Natural Resources. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929409380885
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
