Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 867

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Discordant harmonies: a new ecology for the twenty-first century

·1990·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Acknowledgements PART I: THE CURRENT DILEMMA: A view from a marsh: myths and facts about nature Why the elephants died: breakdown in the management of living resources Moose in the wilderness: stability and the growth of populations Oaks in New Jersey: machine age forests PART II: BACKGROUND TO CRISIS: Mountain lions and mule deer: nature as Divine Order Earth as a fellow creature: organic views of nature In Mill Hollow: nature as the great machine PART III: EVOLVING IMAGES: The forest in the computer: new metaphors for nature Within the moose's stomach: nature as the biosphere Fire in the forest: managing living resources PART IV: RESOLUTIONS FOR OUR TIME: Winds on Mauna Loa: how to approach managing the biospehere The moon in the nautilus shell: nature in the 21st century Postscript: A guide to action Chapter notes Key concepts and terms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.28-2102

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 867

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1990-12-01
Volume
28
Issue
04
Pages
28-2102-28-2102
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W1584266550
Cited by
867
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discordant harmonies: a new ecology for the twenty-first century. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.28-2102
The paper
Discordant harmonies: a new ecology for the twenty-first century. (1990). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.28-2102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.