The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Smart Factory Implementation and Process Innovation: A Preliminary Maturity Model for Leveraging Digitalization in Manufacturing Moving to smart factories presents specific challenges that can be addressed through a structured approach focused on people, processes, and technologies.
Open accessAbstract
Overview: The development of novel digital technologies connected to the Internet of Things, along with advancements in artificial intelligence and automation, is enabling a new wave of manufacturing innovation. “Smart factories” will leverage industrial equipment that communicates with users and with other machines, automated processes, and mechanisms to facilitate real-time communication between the factory and the market to support dynamic adaptation and maximize efficiency. Smart factories can yield a range of benefits, such as increased process efficiency, product quality, sustainability, and safety and decreased costs. However, companies face immense challenges in implementing smart factories, given the large-scale, systemic transformation the move requires. We use data gathered from in-depth studies of five factories in two leading automotive manufacturers to analyze these challenges and identify the key steps needed to implement the smart factory concept. Based on our analysis, we offer a preliminary maturity model for smart factory implementation built around three overarching principles: cultivating digital people, introducing agile processes, and configuring modular technologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Cited by
Burström, T., Parida, V., Lahti, T., & Wincent, J. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.016 · Cited by 424
Self-citationMaturity Assessment for Industry 5.0: A Review of Existing Maturity Models
Hein-Pensel, F., Winkler, H., Brückner, A., Wölke, M., Jabs, I., Mayan, I. J., Kirschenbaum, A., Friedrich, J., & Zinke-Wehlmann, C. (2023) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.12.009 · Cited by 215
Digital transformation capability maturity model enabling the assessment of industrial manufacturers
Gökalp, E., & Martinez, V. (2021) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2021.103522 · Cited by 200
Saeedikiya, M., Salunke, S., & Kowalkiewicz, M. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140718 · Cited by 116
Aras, A., & Büyüközkan, G. (2023) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems11040213 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Sjödin, D. R., Parida, V., Leksell, M., & Petrovic, A.
- Venue
- Research-Technology Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-09-03
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 22-31
- ISSN
- 0895-6308 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-0166
- OpenAlex
- W2890186164
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
