Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chronic Inhalation of Short Asbestos: Lung Fiber Burdens and Histopathology for Monkeys Maintained for 11.5 Years after Exposure

Stettler, Lloyd E., Sharpnack, Douglas D., Krieg, Edward F.·2008·Inhalation Toxicology
DOI 10.1080/08958370701665566
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In an earlier report, Platek et al. (1985) presented the results of an 18-month inhalation exposure of rats and monkeys to short chrysotile asbestos. The mean chamber exposure level was 1.0 mg/m(3) with an average of 0.79 fibers/ml > 5 microm in length. Gross and histopathological examination of exposed and control rats indicated no treatment-related lesions. Asbestos bodies adjacent to the terminal bronchioles, but no fibrosis, were found in lung biopsy tissue taken from the exposed monkeys at 10 months post-exposure. Fifteen monkeys (9 exposed and 6 controls) from this study were maintained for 11.5 years following exposure. Lung fiber burdens were determined by transmission electron microscopy. The mean lung burden (+/- standard deviation) for 59 samples from exposed monkeys was 63 +/- 30 x 10(6) fibers/g dry lung (range, 18-139 x 10(6)). The geometric mean fiber length was 3.5 microm with 35% of the fibers being > 5 microm in length. These data indicate some chrysotile fibers are durable in vivo for a significant period of time. Lungs were examined grossly and microscopically. No lesions attributable to the inhalation exposure were noted. Asbestos bodies were seen in the lungs of treated monkeys, primarily in the interstitium near bronchioles or small pulmonary blood vessels (which also may have been near to bronchioles just out of the plane of section).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08958370701665566

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Brody A. R., 1981, Am. Rev. Resp. Dis., 123, 670
  2. Davis J. M. G., 1986, Br. J. Exp. Path., 67, 415
  3. Davis J. M. G., 1988, Br. J. Exp. Path., 69, 717
  4. Finkelstein M. M., 1999, Am. J. Ind. Med., 35, 01, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199901)35:1<1::AID-AJIM1>3.0.CO;2-5 · DOI
  5. Hesterberg T. W., 1984, Cancer Res., 44, 2170
  6. Pinkerton K. E., 1984, Am. J. Path., 117, 484
  7. Pooley F. R., 1986, Accomplishments in Oncology, The Biological Effects of Chrysotile, 12
  8. Sébastien P., 1986, Biological Effects of Chrysotile, 19
  9. Stanton M. F., 1981, J. Natl. Cancer. Inst., 67, 965

Cited by

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
Stettler, L. E., Sharpnack, D. D., & Krieg, E. F.
Venue
Inhalation Toxicology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2008-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
63-73
ISSN
  • 0895-8378
  • 1091-7691
DOI
10.1080/08958370701665566
Cited by
15
References
31
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.