Networking, entrepreneurship and microbusiness behaviour
Open accessAbstract
It has been argued that networking by owner-managers of small businesses will enhance business performance. Yet to define and demonstrate the presence of networking activity is suffused with methodological difficulties. In this paper the authors attempt to disentangle some of these difficulties. The paper draws on quantifiable data from 104 owner-managers and qualitative data from 34 critical incident interviews from a study of microbusinesses to assess the nature and extent of networking activity. The paper shows: a high proportion of owner-managers use their trading contacts as sources of useful additional information; they use ‘weak ties’ for purposes such as recruitment; a sparse use of institutional networks; an association between networking activity and business performance, although it seems that this must be qualified by sectoral differences; an association between type of owner-manager on a scale of entrepreneurship and networking activity. The policy implications of this paper suggest that economic development agencies continue to have problems reaching out to the microbusiness. This paper recommends that such agencies might use a tool to differentiate more finely amongst the microbusiness population.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evidence from Chell and Baines (2000) suggests that there are quantitative and qualitative differences between entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs and between growth-oriented and non growth-oriented firms in their participation in weak tie networks.
“Evidence from Chell and Baines (2000) suggests that there are quantitative and qualitative differences between entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs and between growth-oriented and non growth-oriented firms (Chell et al., 1991), in their participation in 'weak tie' (Granovetter, 1985) networks.”
From ‘Relationships Mean Everything’; A Typology of Small–Business Relationship Strategies in a Reflexive Context (2002) · cites this paper as Chell and Baines (2000)
Cites
Personal networks and firm competitive strategy—A strategic or coincidental match?
Ostgaard, T. A., & Birley, S. (1994) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/0883-9026(94)90009-4 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fuller, T., & Lewis, J. (2002) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00249 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chell, E., & Baines, S.
- Venue
- Entrepreneurship & Regional Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 195-215
- ISSN
- 0898-5626 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5114
- OpenAlex
- W2169429494
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 17.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Entrepreneurship and Regional Development (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
- Keywords
- business networking, microenterprises, small business owners, weak ties, institutional networks, firm performance, entrepreneurship, recruitment, economic development agencies, sectoral differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review