Cited by 456Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesBusiness Strategy and InnovationMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy

Networking, entrepreneurship and microbusiness behaviour

Open access
Chell, Elizabeth, Baines, Susan·2000·Entrepreneurship & Regional Development

Abstract

It has been argued that networking by owner-managers of small businesses will enhance business performance. Yet to define and demonstrate the presence of networking activity is suffused with methodological difficulties. In this paper the authors attempt to disentangle some of these difficulties. The paper draws on quantifiable data from 104 owner-managers and qualitative data from 34 critical incident interviews from a study of microbusinesses to assess the nature and extent of networking activity. The paper shows: a high proportion of owner-managers use their trading contacts as sources of useful additional information; they use ‘weak ties’ for purposes such as recruitment; a sparse use of institutional networks; an association between networking activity and business performance, although it seems that this must be qualified by sectoral differences; an association between type of owner-manager on a scale of entrepreneurship and networking activity. The policy implications of this paper suggest that economic development agencies continue to have problems reaching out to the microbusiness. This paper recommends that such agencies might use a tool to differentiate more finely amongst the microbusiness population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/089856200413464

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence from Chell and Baines (2000) suggests that there are quantitative and qualitative differences between entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs and between growth-oriented and non growth-oriented firms in their participation in weak tie networks.

    “Evidence from Chell and Baines (2000) suggests that there are quantitative and qualitative differences between entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs and between growth-oriented and non growth-oriented firms (Chell et al., 1991), in their participation in 'weak tie' (Granovetter, 1985) networks.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Chell, E., & Baines, S.
Venue
Entrepreneurship & Regional Development
Published
2000-07
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
195-215
ISSN
  • 0898-5626 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5114
OpenAlex
W2169429494
Cited by
456
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 25
FWCI
17.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Entrepreneurship and Regional Development (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Keywords
business networking, microenterprises, small business owners, weak ties, institutional networks, firm performance, entrepreneurship, recruitment, economic development agencies, sectoral differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review