The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
‘Entrepreneuring’ as a conceptual attractor? A review of process theories in 20 years of entrepreneurship studies
Abstract
Entrepreneuring has never achieved a breakthrough as the key concept that could elucidate the inherently process-oriented character of entrepreneurship, but it may be able to serve as the conceptual attractor to accommodate the increasing interest in process theories within a creative process view. This paper considers whether this is possible. In addition to equilibrium-based understandings of the entrepreneurial process, this paper tentatively reconstructs the creative process view by distinguishing between a range of relevant perspectives: from those on complexity and chaos theory, to the interpretive and phenomenological, social constructionist, pragmatic and practice-based, to the relational materialist. Taking entrepreneuring as an open-ended concept to use in theoretical experimentation, the review documents the potential for the concept to develop new meanings and to attach itself to a series of concepts such as recursivity, enactment, disclosure, narration, discourse, dramatization, dialogicality, effectuation, social practice, translation and assemblage. It is argued that the very act of theorizing about the concept of ‘entrepreneuring’ indicates a move from methodological individualism to a relational turn in entrepreneurship studies, one that inscribes entrepreneurship into a social ontology of becoming.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory
Latour, B. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 · Cited by 16,778
Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves
DAVIES, B., & HARRÉ, R. (1990) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x · Cited by 5,357
Explaining Development and Change in Organizations
van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080329 · Cited by 3,762
Cited by
The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application
Dorst, K. (2011) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006 · Cited by 1,897
Bacq, S., & Janssen, F. (2011) · Entrepreneurship & Regional Development · doi:10.1080/08985626.2011.577242 · Cited by 1,037
Carrots and Rainbows: Motivation and Social Practice in Open Source Software Development1
von Krogh, G., Haefliger, S., Spaeth, S., & Wallin, M. W. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41703471 · Cited by 698
The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A complex adaptive systems approach
Roundy, P. T., Bradshaw, M., & Brockman, B. K. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.032 · Cited by 681
Capturing action from within: the use of personal diaries
van Burg, E., & Karlsson, T. (2020) · Research Handbook on Entrepreneurial Behavior, Practice and Process · doi:10.4337/9781788114523.00017 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Steyaert, C.
- Venue
- Entrepreneurship & Regional Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 453-477
- ISSN
- 0898-5626 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5114
- OpenAlex
- W2008327985
- Cited by
- 643
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 17.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ‘Entrepreneuring’ as a conceptual attractor? A review of process theories in 20 years of entrepreneurship studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08985620701671759
- The paper
- Steyaert, C. (2007). ‘Entrepreneuring’ as a conceptual attractor? A review of process theories in 20 years of entrepreneurship studies. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620701671759
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.