Cited by 681Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesUniversity-Industry-Government Innovation ModelsPrivate Equity and Venture Capital

The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A complex adaptive systems approach

Open access
Roundy, Philip T., Bradshaw, Mike, Brockman, Beverly K.·2018·Journal of Business Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.032

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roundy, P. T., Bradshaw, M., & Brockman, B. K.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (US)
Corresponding author
Roundy, Philip T.
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
86
Pages
1-10
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2794333010
Cited by
681
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 96 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 15 · 2016: 1
FWCI
66.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Private Equity and Venture Capital
Keywords
entrepreneurial ecosystems, complex adaptive systems, complexity science, agent-based modeling, qualitative comparative analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review