Cited by 40Electronic Health Records SystemsERP Systems Implementation and ImpactMedical Coding and Health Information

Lessons Learned from Pilot Site Implementation of an Ambulatory Electronic Health Record

Open access
Fullerton, Cliff, Aponte, Phil, Hopkins, Robert, Bragg, David, Ballard, David J.·2006·Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings

Abstract

As ambulatory care practices face increasing pressure to implement electronic health records (EHRs), there is a growing need to determine the essential elements of a successful implementation strategy. HealthTexas Provider Network is in the process of implementing an EHR system comprising GE Centricity Physician Office-EMR 2005, Clinical Content Consultants (now part of GE), and Kryptiq Secure Messaging throughout all 88 practices in the Dallas-Fort Worth area and is hoping to extend the system to other practices affiliated with Baylor Health Care System as well. We describe the preimplementation clinical process redesign and quality improvement training that has been conducted networkwide in preparation for the introduction of the EHR, as well as the specific steps taken to prepare and train clinic staff for the integration of the EHR into daily workflows. The first pilot site, Family Medical Center at North Garland, implemented the system in May 2006. Based on both the positive aspects of this experience and the challenges we encountered, we identified 20 essential elements for successful implementation in the areas of site selection, implementation strategy, staff education and preparation, team project management, content, hardware and software, and workflow process. Broadly, we determined that 1) a pilot site's understanding of and willingness to work within the fluid nature of the implementation process during what is essentially a testing phase is a key ingredient in achieving success at the pilot site and in improving the process for later sites; 2) input from and representation of viewpoints of all types of EHR users during preimplementation decision making enables customization of the system and sufficient preplanning to ensure minimal workflow disruptions during and after implementation; and 3) a high level of technical and training support during the early days of implementation is invaluable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08998280.2006.11928188

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Real-time troubleshooting facilitates the effective use of the eHealth system.

    “Real time troubleshooting (especially through internal resources) facilitates the effective use of the eHealth system and becomes essential to the system success in terms of actual usage [49,124].”
  • Real-time troubleshooting is essential to the eHealth system's success in terms of actual usage.

    “Real time troubleshooting (especially through internal resources) facilitates the effective use of the eHealth system and becomes essential to the system success in terms of actual usage [49,124].”
  • Internal IT staff may respond more quickly to an urgent request than external support services from the IT vendor.

    “Compared with external support services from the IT vendor, internal IT staff is more familiar with the work environment and related needs, and may respond more quickly to an urgent request [124].”
  • Internal IT staff is more familiar with the work environment and related needs than external support services from the IT vendor.

    “Compared with external support services from the IT vendor, internal IT staff is more familiar with the work environment and related needs, and may respond more quickly to an urgent request [124].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fullerton, C., Aponte, P., Hopkins, R., Bragg, D., & Ballard, D. J.
Corresponding author
Ballard, David J.
Venue
Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings
Published
2006-10
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
303-310
ISSN
  • 0899-8280 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3252
OpenAlex
W1866025273
Cited by
40
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
electronic health record implementation, outpatient care, pilot sites, implementation strategies, quality improvement education, employee training, workflow integration, site selection, user participation, technical support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review