Cited by 0Biblical Studies and InterpretationAncient Egypt and ArchaeologyAncient Near East History

The Biblical Pithom and Tell el-Maskhuta

Collins, Andrew·2008·Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament

Abstract

Recent theories that locate the Biblical Pithom (Exod 1,11) at the Late Bronze Age site of Tell er-Retabah fail to take account of the archaeological evidence and the Greco-Roman literary sources that demonstrate that a well known city called Pithom was located at Tell el-Maskhuta in the Iron Age. That the occurrence of the toponym Pithom in Exod 1,11 is an anachronistic addition to the Exodus tradition is still the best view.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09018320802185176

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Authors
Collins, A.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Collins, Andrew
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament
Published
2008-05
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
135-149
ISSN
  • 0901-8328 (ISSN-L)
  • 1502-7244
OpenAlex
W2001663820
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
Keywords
anachronism, Exodus tradition, Late Bronze Age, Greco-Roman sources, biblical archaeology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review