Cited by 27Cognitive Abilities and TestingDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

IQ and ability across the adult life span

Baxendale, Sallie·2011·Applied Neuropsychology

Abstract

The experience of cognitive decline can be a potent source of anxiety and concern for many people. While an IQ consistent with estimated optimal levels or previously recorded scores may indicate no significant change in cognitive function, the patient may be accurately reporting a normal age-related deterioration in actual ability. The aim of this article is to chart the age-related changes in intellectual abilities evident on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV). The norms from the WAIS-IV manual were examined to plot the age-related changes in Full-Scale IQ (FSIQ) and composite scores across the adult life span, while holding actual ability level constant across the age groups. Here we present a graphical representation of the normal cognitive developments and declines in FSIQ, Verbal Comprehension, Perceptual Reasoning, Working Memory, and Processing Speed across the adult life span. This graphical representation provides a rational basis for the identification of atypical profiles/complaints of cognitive deterioration that may require further specialist neuropsychological evaluation. These graphs can be used to provide reassurance for healthy adults with concerns of cognitive decline and as an educative tool for their referring agencies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09084282.2011.595442

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The weight of declarative knowledge is substantially greater in VCI subtests reflecting Gc than in all other subtests that place little emphasis on declarative knowledge, as illustrated by their lesser decline with age and higher correlation with education and socio-economic levels.

    “Still, the weight of declarative knowledge is substantially greater in VCI subtests reflecting Gc, as illustrated by their lesser decline with age (Baxendale, 2011, Grégoire, 1993;Kaufman et al., 1989, Ryan et al., 2000) and their higher correlation with education and socio-economic levels (Dori & Chelune, 2004;Heaton et al., 2003;Holdnack et al., 2013), than all other subtests that place little”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baxendale, S.
Affiliations
Epilepsy Society (GB)
Corresponding author
Baxendale, Sallie
Venue
Applied Neuropsychology
Published
2011-07
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
164-167
ISSN
  • 0908-4282 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4826
OpenAlex
W2036329594
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
age-related cognitive decline, Full Scale IQ, adult lifespan, verbal comprehension, perceptual reasoning, working memory, processing speed, cognitive development, neuropsychological assessment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cognition, Humans, Intelligence, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Wechsler Scales, Life Tables

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review