Cited by 18Multilingual Education and PolicyTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesSecond Language Learning and Teaching

Opening up towards children’s languages: Enhancing teachers’ tolerant practices towards multilingualism

Van Der Wildt, Anouk, Van Avermaet, Piet, Van Houtte, Mieke·2017·School Effectiveness and School Improvement

Abstract

Mainstream teachers struggle with linguistic diversity, often leading to restricting multilingualism. Scientific research, however, recommends including pupils’ home languages in school. Various qualitative studies have evaluated implementations in schools and indicated possibilities for improving teachers’ attitudes towards multilingualism. This paper evaluates an experimental implementation targeting an increase in tolerance towards multilingualism. The implementation was facilitated by external school coaches and consisted of 3 experimental tools affecting the school. Data originated from 62 Flemish primary schools (of which half were experimental schools) that participated in 3 survey waves (2012 and 2014; 763 teachers completed both waves). We used multilevel regression. We concluded that the implementation leads to higher rates of tolerance. The fulfilment of the basic conditions needed for a successful change was important, and the linguistic diversity of the pupil population and the investment by external school coaches did not affect the tolerant practices of teachers towards multilingualism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09243453.2016.1252406

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 45 papers showed great variation when it comes to design and sample size, ranging from single case studies including two teachers in two school settings to large scale PD interventions including more than 500 teachers in over 60 schools.

    “the 45 papers showed great variation when it comes to design and sample size, ranging from single case studies including two teachers in two school settings (i.e., Brown, Babiak, Weber, & Yoon, 2016) to large scale PD interventions including more than 500 teachers in over 60 schools (i.e., Van der Wildt et al., 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Der Wildt, A., Van Avermaet, P., & Van Houtte, M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Sociology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • Department of Linguistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Venue
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
Published
2016-11-21
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
136-152
ISSN
  • 0924-3453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5124
OpenAlex
W2551355423
Cited by
18
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • School Effectiveness and School Improvement (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (110008)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
multilingualism, teacher attitudes, linguistic diversity, school coaches, implementation evaluation, elementary school, teacher practices, Flemish schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review