Cited by 495Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistics Education and MethodologiesPhilosophy and History of Science

A Second Chance to Get Causal Inference Right: A Classification of Data Science Tasks

Open access
Hernán, Miguel A., Hsu, John, Healy, Brian·2019·CHANCE

Abstract

For much of the recent history of science, learning from data was the academic realm of statistics,1,2 but in the early 20th century, the founders of modern statistics made a momentous decision abo...

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09332480.2019.1579578

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ML can play a role in causal inference, including in policy problems and in climate-relevant scenarios such as estimating the effects of temperature on human mortality and the effects of World Bank projects on vegetative cover.

    “ML can play a role in causal inference [41,340,619], including in the context of policy problems [40,453] and in climate-relevant scenarios such as estimating the effects of temperature on human mortality [356] and the effects of World Bank projects on vegetative cover [883].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [340]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Beam, A.L., and Kohane I.S. 2018. Big Data and Machine Learning in Health Care. JAMA 319(13):1,317-8.
  2. Robins, J.M., and Greenland, S. 1986. The role of model selection in causal inference from nonexperimental data. American Journal of Epidemiology 123(3):392-402.
  3. Hernán, M.A. 2015. Invited commentary: Agent-based models for causal inference-reweighting data and theory in epidemiology. American Journal of Epidemiology 2181(2):103-5.
  4. Hernán, M.A, Hernández-Díaz, S., Werler, M.M., and Mitchell, A.A. 2002. Causal knowledge as a prerequisite for confounding evaluation: an application to birth defects epidemiology. American Journal of Epidemiology 155:176-84.
  5. Greenland, S., Pearl, .J, and Robins, J.M. Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology 1999; 10(1):37-48.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hernán, M. A., Hsu, J., & Healy, B.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
CHANCE
Published
2019-01-02
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
42-49
ISSN
  • 0933-2480 (ISSN-L)
  • 1867-2280
OpenAlex
W2798958557
Cited by
495
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
40.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CHANCE (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
causal inference, history of statistics, learning from data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review