Delayed choice for entanglement swapping
Open accessAbstract
Two observers (Alice and Bob) independently prepare two sets of singlets. They test one particle of each singlet along an arbitrarily chosen direction and send the other particle to a third observer, Eve. At a later time, Eve performs joint tests on pairs of particles (one from Alice and one from Bob). According to Eve's choice of test and to her results, Alice and Bob can sort into subsets the samples that they have already tested, and they can verify that each subset behaves as if it consisted of entangled pairs of distant particles that have never communicated in the past, even indirectly via other particles.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., & Wootters, W. K. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1895 · Cited by 13,703 · see citing works
Self-citationEntanglement of a pair of quantum bits
Hill, S., & Wootters, W. K. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.5022 · Cited by 2,823 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [15]15. Zurek, W. H. (Reading: Addison-Wesley).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry
Pan, J.-W., Chen, Z.-B., Lu, C.-Y., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., & Żukowski, M. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.777 · Cited by 1,410 · see citing works
“This may be used in higher-dimensional quantum cryptography (e.g., Bechmann-Pasquinucci and Peres, 2000; Cerf et al., 2002).”
MethodHow quantum brain biology can rescue conscious free will
Hameroff, S. (2012) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2012.00093 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Complementarity and Information in “Delayed-choice for Entanglement Swapping”
Brukner, Č., Aspelmeyer, M., & Zeilinger, A. (2005) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-005-7355-2 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
The collapse of the wave function as the mediator of free will in prime neurons
Loboguerrero, D. A. (2025) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2025.1637217
- Authors
- Peres, A.
- Affiliations
- Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Peres, Asher
- Venue
- Journal of Modern Optics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 139-143
- ISSN
- 0950-0340 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2078750979
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 0.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Journal of Modern Optics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Keywords
- entanglement swapping, delayed choice, singlet state, quantum entanglement, joint measurement, quantum nonlocality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
