Cited by 232Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum optics and atomic interactionsSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices

Quantum Random-number Generation and Key Sharing

Rarity, J.G., Owens, P.C.M., Tapster, P.R.·1994·Journal of Modern Optics

Abstract

We review the status of interferometry-based quantum cryptography and compare photon-pair and faint-pulse schemes. The key technical limitations in both cases are the propagation losses and detector performance. We also discuss a simple approach to generating the random measurement bases used in quantum cryptography systems which exploits random partition at a beam splitter. This removes the need for active components in the receiver, reducing system complexity and losses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09500349414552281

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rarity and collaborators proposed a physical quantum-mechanical random generator based on the 50:50 splitting of a beam of single photons.

    “Rarity and collaborators (Rarity et al 1994) proposed a physical quantummechanical random generator based on the 50 : 50 splitting of a beam of single photons.”

    From Single-photon sources (2005) · cites this paper as Rarity et al 1994

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 232

Authors
Rarity, J. G., Owens, P. C. M., & Tapster, P. R.
Venue
Journal of Modern Optics
Published
1994-12
Volume
41
Issue
12
Pages
2435-2444
ISSN
  • 0950-0340 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-3044
OpenAlex
W2031585547
Cited by
232
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Modern Optics (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Keywords
quantum random number generation, quantum key distribution, photon pair sources, path loss, detector performance, receiver complexity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review